ГОСТ Р ИСО 14915-3—2016
[59] PARK I. and HANNAFIN J. (1994). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Education
Technology Research and Development. 41(3), pp. 63— 85
[60] PARK O. and HOPKINS R. (1993). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review. Instructional
Science. 21. pp. 427—449
[61] PATTERSON R.D. (1982). Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft. CAA Paper 82017. Civil Aviation
Authority
[62] PEZDEK K.. MAKI R.. et al. (1988). Picture memory: recognizing added and deleted details. Journal of Experimen
tal Psychology: Learning. Memory & Cognition. 14(3). pp. 468—476
[63] POSNER M. (1976). Visual dominance: an information processing account of its origins and significance. Psycho
logical Review. 83, pp. 157— 171
[64] PURNELL K. and SOLMAN R. (1991). The influence of technical illustrations on students’ comprehension in geog
raphy. Reading Research Quarterly, pp. 277—299
[65] REISER R. and GAGNE R. (1982). Characteristics of media selection model. Review of Educational Research,
52(4). pp. 499—512
[66] RIEBER L.P. (1990). Animation in computer based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Develop
ment. 38. pp. 77—86
[67] ROGERS Y. and SCAIFE M. (1998). How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning. In Lee J. (Ed.) IntelBgence
and multimodality in multimedia interfaces: research and applications. AAAI Press
[68] RUBIN A. (1980). Atheoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In Spiro R.. Bruce B.
& Brewer W. (Eds.) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
[69]SALOMON G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. Jossey Bass
[70] SCAIFE M. and ROGERS Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Jour
nal of Human-Computer Studies. 45. pp. 185— 213
[71] STASKO J.. BADRE A. and LEWIS C. (1993). Do algorithm moving images assist learning? In Proceedings СНГ93.
ACM. pp. 61—66
[72] SUTCLIFFE A.G. and FARADAY P.M. (1994). Designing presentation in multimedia interfaces. In Proceedings of
C H I’94. ACM. pp. 92—98
[73] TRAVERS R.M. (1967). Research and theory related to audio-visual information transmission: US Office contract
No OES-16-006. Western Michigan University
[74] TREISMAN A. (1988). Features and objects: fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology. 40A(2). pp. 201—237
[75] TREISMAN A. and DAVIES A. (1973). Divided attention to eye and ear. In Kornblum S. (Ed.) Attention and perfor
mance IV. Academic Press
[76] VETERE F., HOWARD S. and LEUNG Y. (1997). A multimedia interaction space. In Howard S.. Hammond J. &
Lingaard G. (Eds.) Proceedings of INTERACT 97. Chapman and Hall, pp. 205—211
[77] VANDERVONCKT J. and BODART F. (1993). Encapsulating knowledge for intelligent automatic interaction objects
selection. In Proceedings of INTERCHI ’93. ACM
[78] WETZEL C.D.. RADTKE P.H. and STERN H.W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Lawrence Erl
baum Associates
[79] WICKENS C.D.. SANDRY D. and VIDULICH M. (1983). Compatibility and resource competition between modalities
of input, output and central processing. Human Factors. 25, pp. 227—248
[80] WILLIAMS D., DUNCUMB I. and ALTY J.L. (1996). Matching media to goals: an approach based on expressive
ness. In Sasse M.A.. Cunningham R.J. & Winder R.L. (Eds.) People and Computers XI. Proceedings of НСГ96.
Springer
43