ГОСТ Р 55241.50— 2014
Часть вторая: методы, предполагающ ие непосредственное участие пользователей
[39]
A
lreck
.
Р. L. and
S
ettle
.
R. В. (1994). The Survey Research Handbook. Irwirtg Professional Publishing. Chicago
II
[40]
C
arroll
.
J. M..
K
oene
m
ann
-B
ellw eau
.
J.. Rosson. M. B.. Singley. M. К (1993). Critical Incidents and Critical
Themes in Empirical Usability Evaluation. Proceedings of the НСГ93 Conference on People and Computers VIII.
pp. 279-292
[41]
C
a s t il o
,
J. C.,
H
artso
m
,
H. R..
H
ix
.
D. (1998). Remote Usability Evaluation: Can Users Report Their Own
Critical Incidents? Late Breaking Results: Ubiquitous Usability Engineering. Proceedings of ACM CHI 98
Conference on Human-factors in Computing Systems (Summary), V.2. pp. 253-254
[42]
F
ath
.
J. L.. M
ann
, T. L. and
H
olzwan
,
T. G. (1994). A practical guide to using software usability labs: lessons
learned at IBM. Behavior and Information Technology: Special Issue on Usability Laboratories, vol. 13 (1-2). pp. 94-
105
[43]
F
oody
.
W. (1994). Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social
Research. Cambridge University Press
[44]
H
ackos
.
J. T. and
R
edish
.
J. C (1998). User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. John Wiley & Sons
[45]
H
oltzblatt
,
K. and
J
ones
.
S. (1991). Contextual inquiry: a participatory technique for systems design in Schuler.
D. and Namioka. A. Participatory design: Principles and practices. Erlbaum
[46]
K
irw an
.
B.. and
A
insworth
.
L.
K.
(Eds.), (1992). A guide to task analysis: Taylor & Francis
[47]
K
oene
m
ann
-B
ellw eau
.
J..
C
arroll
,
J. M.,
R
o sson
.
M. B..
S
ingley
,
M. K. Comparative Usability Evaluation:
Critical Incidents and Critical Threads (1994). Proceedings of ACM СНГ94 Conference on Human-factors in
Computing Systems. V.1, pp.245-251
[48]M
ac
k
a y
,
W. E. (1995). Ethics, lies and videotape... In Proceedings of the СНГ95 Conference. Denver. Colorado.
May 7th-11th. ACM Press, pp. 138-145
[49]
N
clsen
.
J. (Ed.), (1994). Special Issue on Usability laboratories. Behaviour and Information Technology. Vol. 13-
2. January-April
[50]
O
ppenhei
m
,
A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Design. Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Printer Pub. Ltd
[51]
P
erl
m
an
.
G. (1985). Electronic surveys. Behavior Research: Methods. Instruments and Computers. 17 (2). pp.
203-205
[52]
R
u bik
.
J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan. Design & Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley &
Sons
[53]
S
alant
.
P. and
O
il
m
a n
,
D. A.. (1994). How to Conduct Your Own Survey, John Wiley & Sons
[54]
S
ebillotte
,
S., (1991). Decrire des laches selon les objectifs des operateurs: de I’interview a la formalisation. Le
travailhumain. 54 (3), Puf. Paris
[55]Wixon. D. R.. Williges. В. H.. Williges. R. C.. del Galdo. E. M. (1995). An Evaluation of Critical Incidents for
Software Documentation Design Computer Potpourri. In Human-factors Perspectives on Human- Computer
Interaction: Selecbons from the Human-factors
&
Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings 19831994 / Gary Perlman
I
Georgia K. Green
I
Michael S. Wogaller. pp.38-42 Santa Monica. California Human- factors and Ergonomics
Society
Часть третья: М етоды, предполагающ ие непрямое участив пользователей
Методы, основанны е на изучении документов
[56]
B
i
a s
.
R. (1994). The pluralistic usabilty walkthrough: coordinated empathies in Nielsen. J. and Mack. R. Usability
inspection methods, pp. 63-76. John Wiley & Sons Inc
[57]Dumas. J. S. and Redish. J. (1993). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Ablex. Norwood
[58]Dumas. J. S. and Redish. J. C. (1994). A practical guide to usability testing. Ablex Publishing Coorporation
Norwood. New Jersey
[59]
G
ediga
.
G.
H
a
m
borg
,
K.
D
untsch
,
I. (1999). The IsoMetrics usability inventory. An operationalisation of ISO
9241-10. Behaviour and Information Technology
[60]
G
orny
,
P. (1995).
E
xpo se
,
HCI-Counseling for User Interface Design, In: Proceedings of INTERACT95. K.
Norbly. P.H. Helmersen, D.J. Gimore. S.A. Amesen. (eds) Chapman & Hall
[61]
G
reen
8
au
m
.
F. J. and
K
yng
.
M. (Eds.) (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems.
Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
[62]
I
anella
.
R. (1995). HyperSAM. a Management Tool for Large User Guidelines Sets. СНГ94 Special Interest
Group Trip Report in SIGCHI. Volume 27. Number 2. ISSN 0736-6906. pp. 48-49. April
[63]
L
eulier
.
C. (1997). Ergonomic guidelines for the design and evaluation of W’eb sites. Institut national de
recherche en informatique et en automatique. Rocquencourt. France
[64]
L
inogaard
.
G. (1994). Usability Testing and System Evaluation: A Guide for Designing Useful Computer Systems.
Chapman and Hall. London
[65]
L
ow gren
,
J. and
N
ordovist
,
T. (1992). Knowledge-Based evaluation as Design Support for Graphical User
Interfaces, in Proceedings of СНГ92. Human-factors in Computing Systems, pp. 181-188
[66]
M
ac
L
eak
,
A..
Y
oung
,
R. M „
B
elloti
.
V. and
M
oran
.
T. (1996). Questions. Options and Criteria: Elements of
Design Space Analysis. In: Thomas P. Moran and John M. Carroll (Eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts.
Techniques, and Use. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
[67]
M
ayhew
,
D. J. (1992). Principles and recommendations in software user interface design. Englewood Cliffs:
Prentice Hall
[68]
N
endjo
. E
lla
.
A..
K
olski
.
C..
W
aw ak
,
F..
J
acques
.
C. and Y
im
. P. (1999). An approach of computer-aided choice
35