ГОСТ IEC 60601-2-33—2011
(67)SCHENCK. JF.. DUMOULIN, CL. REOINGTON, RW.. KRESSEL. HY.. ELLIOTT. RT.. MCDOUGALL.
IL. Human exposure to 4.0-Testa magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Med Phys. 1992 July. 19(4).
pp. 1089 - 1098
£68) RAYLMAN. RR., CLAVO.AC, WAHL. RL. Exposure to strong static magnetic field slows the growth of human
cancer cells Invitro. Bioeiectromagnetics. 1996. 17(5). pp. 358-363
(69)KROEKER. G.. PARKINSON. D„ VRIEND. J.. PEELING. J. Neurochemical effects of static magnetic field
exposure. Surg Neurol. 1996 Jan.. 45(1). pp. 62 - 66
(70) NARRA. VR.. HOWELL. RW.. GODDU. SM.. RAO. DV. Effects of a 1.5-Tesla static magnetic field on
spermatogenesis and embryogenesls in mice. Invest Radiol. 1996 Sep. 31(9), pp. 586-590
(71)EHENSON. P..DUBOC. D.. LAVERGNE. T.. GUIZE. L. GUERIN. F.. DEGEORGES. M.. SYROTA, A. Change
In human cardiac rhythm induced by a 2-T static magnetic field. Radiology 1988 Jan., 166(1 Pt 1). pp. 227-230
(72) KINOUCHI. Y.. YAMAGUCHI. H.. TENFORDE. TS. Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with
aortic blood flow. Bioeiectromagnetics. 1996. 17(1), pp. 21-32
(73)U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and
Radiological Health. Guidance for Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices — Criteria for Significant R
isk
Investigations. 1997
(74)National Radiological Protection Board (UK). Guidance as to Restrictions on Exposures to Static(DC) Electnc
and Magnetic Fields. Supplement to NRPB-GS11. 1989
(75)American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGlH). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical
Substances and Physical Agents. 1993-1994
(76)MILLER. G. Exposure Guidelines for Magnetic Fields. Am Ind ИудAssoc Jour. 1987. 48. pp. 957-968
(77)Australian Radiation Laboratory. Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Facilities. 1991.
(78) International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines on Limits of Exposure
to Static Magnetic Fields. Health Physics. 1994. 66 (1). pp. 100-106
(79)KELTNER. JR.. ROOS. MS.. BRAKEMAN. PR. and BUDINGER. TF. Magnetohydrodynamics of Blood Flow.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1990.16. pp. 139-149
(80)GANONG. WF. Review of Medical Physiology. 6th Edition. Los Altos. CA. Lange Medical Publ. 1973
(81)REILLY. JP.Cardiac sensitivity to electrical stimulation. U.S. Food and DrugAdministration Report MT 89-101.
1989
(82)SCHENCK. JF. Safety of Strong. Static Magnetic Fields. J of Magn. Res. Imaging. 2000. 12. 2-19
(83) National Electrical Manufacturers Association. MR Section. Accessory equipment considerations with respect
to magnetic resonance imaging compatibility. J of Magn. Res. Imaging. 1998
(84) BERNHARDT. JH. The establenment of frequency dependent limits for electric and magnetic fields and
evaluation of indirect effects. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 1988. 27. pp. 1-27
(85) REILLY. JP. Peripheral nerve and cardiac excitation by time-varying magnetic fields: A comparison of
thresholds. NYAcad. ofSci.. 1992. 649. pp. 96-117
(86)LAPICOUE. L.. Definition experimental de lexcitation. Comptes Rendues Acad. Sci.. 1909. 67. pp.280-285
(87)IRNlCH W.. SCHMITT F. Magnetosiimulation «i MRl. Mag. Res. Med.. 1995. 33. pp. 619-623
(88) SCHAEFER. D.J. Safety Aspects of Radio Frequency Power Deposition in Magnetic Resonance. E. Kanal.
ed. MRl Climes of North America. 1998. 6(4). pp. 775-789
(89)HAM. CGL, ENGELS. JML.. VAN DE WIEL. GT.. MACHIELSEN. A. Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRl:
effects of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates. J. Mag. Res. Imaging. 1997. 5. pp. 933-937
(90)BOURLAND. JD.. NYENHUIS. JA. and SCHAEFER. DJ. Physiologic Effects of Intense MRl Gradient Fields.
Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 1999. 9(2). pp. 363-377
(91) HEBRANK. FX. and GEBHARDT M. SAFE Model —anew method for predicting peripheral nerve stimulations
In MRl. Soc. Mag.Res. Im. Proceedings 2000 conference. 2000. p. 2007
(92)BOTWELL. R. and BOWLEY. L.M. Analytic calculations of the E-Fields Induced by Time-Varying Magnetic
Fields Generated by Cylindrical Gradient Coils. Mag. Res. Med.. 2000. 44. pp. 782-790
(93)HARVEY. P.R. and MANSFIELD. P. Avoiding Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Gradient Waveform Criteria For
Optimum Resolution in EPI. Mag. Res. Med.. 1994. 32. pp. 236-241
194) MANSFIELD. P. and HARVEY. PR. Limitsto Neural Stimulation in EPI. Mag. Res. Med., 1993,29. pp. 746-758
(95) FRESE. G.. HEBRANK. FX.. RENZ. W.. STORCH. T. PhysAalische Parameter bei der Anwendung der MRT.
Radiologe. 1998. 38. pp. 750-758
(96) BUDINGER. TF.. FISCHER. H.. HENTSCHEL. D.. REINFELOER. HE.. SCHMITT. F. Physiological effects of
fast oscHating magnetic field gradients. Jour. Сотр. Ass. Tech. 1991. 15. pp. 909-914
(97) DEN BOER. JA.. BAKKER. R., HAM. CGL.. SMINK. J. Generalization to complex stimulus shape of the nerve
stimulation threshold based on existing knowledge of its relation to stimulus duration for rectangular stunuli.
Proceedings ISMRM 1999. p. 108
(98)SAUNDERS. RD.. SIENKIEWICZ. ZJ. and KOWALCZUK. Cl. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields and
radiation. J. Radiol. Prot.. 1991.11. pp. 27-42
(99)BOTTOMLEY. PA. and ANDREW. ER. RF magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in
biological tissue: Implications for NMR imaging. Phys. Med. Biol.. 1978. 23. pp.630-643
(100) SCHENCK. JF. and HUSSAIN. MA. Power deposition during magnetic resonance. The effects of local
inhomogeneities and field exclusion. General Electric Corporate Research and development Labs. NMR
Project Memo No. 84-199. Oct 17,1984
66