ГОСТ Р МЭК 60601 -2-33— 2009
[63]VYALOV. A M. Clinico-hygenic and experimental data on the effects of magnetic fields under industrial conditions. In
KHOLODOV. Yu. A., ed. Influence of Magnetic Fields on Biological Objects. Joint Publ Res Service Rep No.
63038. Springfield. VA; National Technical Information Service. 1974. pp. 163 — 174
[64]KAY. HH.. HERFKENS, RJ..and KAY. BK. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on Xenopus laevis embryogenesis.
Magn Reson Imaging 1988. 6. pp. 501 — 506
[65]MCROBBIE D.. FOSTER MA. Pulsed magnetic field exposure during pregnancy and implications for NMR foetal
imaging: a study with mice. Magn Reson Imaging 1985. 3. pp. 231 — 234
[66] PRASAD. N.. WRIGHT. DA.. FORD. JJ.. THORNBY. Jl. Safety of 4-T MR imaging: study ofeffectson developing frog
embryos. Radiology. 1990 Jan.. 174 (1). pp. 251 — 253
[67] SCHENCK. JF.. DUMOULIN. CL. REDINGTON. RW.. KRESSEL. HY.. ELLIOTT. RT.. MCDOUGALL. IL. Human
exposure to 4.0-Testa magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Med Phys. 1992 July. 19 (4). pp. 1089 — 1098
[68] RAYLMAN, RR.. CLAVO. AC. WAHL. RL. Exposure to strong static magnetic field slows the growth of human
cancer cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996. 17 (5). pp. 358 — 363
[69]KROEKER. G.. PARKINSON. D.. VRIEND. J.. PEELING. J. Neurochemical effects of staticmagnetic field exposure.
Surg Neurol. 1996 Jan.. 45 (1). pp. 62 — 66
[70] NARRA. VR.. HOWELL, RW.. GODDU. SM„ RAO. DV. Effectsofa 1.5-Teslastaticmagnetic fieldon spermatogenesis
and embryogenesis in mice. Invest Radiol. 1996 Sep.. 31 (9), pp. 586 — 590
[71]EHENSON, P.. DUBOC. D.. LAVERGNE. T. GUIZE. L. GUERIN. F.. DEGEORGES. M.. SYROTA. A. Change in
human cardiac rhythm induced by a 2-T static magnetic field. Radiology 1988 Jan., 166 (1 Pt 1). pp. 227 — 230
[72]KINOUCHI. Y„ YAMAGUCHI. H.. TENFORDE. TS. Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with aortic
blood flow. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996. 17 (1). pp. 21 — 32
[73] U.S. DepartmentofHealth and Human Services. Foodand DrugAdministration. Center for Devicesand Radiological
Health. Guidance for Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices - Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations. 1997
[74] National Radiological Protection Board (UK). Guidance as to Restrictions on Exposures to Static (DC) Electric
and Magnetic Fields. Supplement to NRPB-GS11, 1989
[75]American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical
Substances and Physical Agents. 1993—1994
[76] MILLER. G. Exposure Guidelines for Magnetic Fields. Am Ind Hyg Assoc Jour. 1987. 48. pp. 957 — 968
[77] Australian Radiation Laboratory. Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Facilities. 1991
[78] International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to
Static Magnetic Fields. Health Physics. 1994, 66 (1). pp. 100 — 106
[79]KELTNER. JR.. ROOS. MS.. BRAKEMAN. PR. andBUDINGER.TF. Magnetohydrodynamicsof Blood Row. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 1990. 16. pp. 139 — 149
[80]GANONG. WF. Review of Medical Physiology. 6th Edition. Los Altos. CA: Lange Medical Publ. 1973
[81]REILLY. JP. Cardiac sensitivity to electrical stimulation. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Report MT 89-101,
1989
[82]SCHENCK. JF. Safetyof Strong. Static Magnetic Fields. J of Magn. Res. Imaging. 2000. 12. pp. 2—19
[83] National Electrical Manufacturers Association. MR Section. Accessory equipment considerations with respect to
magnetic resonance imaging compatibility. J of Magn. Res. Imaging. 1998
[84] BERNHARDT. JH. The establishment of frequency dependent limits for electric and magnetic fields and evaluation
of indirect effects. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 1988. 27. pp. 1— 27
[85]REILLY. JP. Peripheral nerve and cardiac excitation by time-varying magnetic fields: A comparison of thresholds.
NY Acad. ofSd.. 1992. 649. pp. 96 — 117
[86]LAPICQUE. L. Definition experimental de I’excitation. Comptes Rendues Acad. Sci.. 1909. 67. pp. 280 — 285
[87]IRNICH W.. SCHMITT F. Magnetostimulation in MRI. Mag. Res. Med.. 1995. 33. pp. 619 — 623
[88]SCHAEFER. DJ. Safety Aspects of Radio Frequency Power Deposition in Magnetic Resonance. E. Kanal. ed. MRI
Clinics of North America. 1998. 6(4). pp. 775 — 789
[89] HAM. CGL. ENGELS. JML.. VAN DEWIEL. GT.. MACHIELSEN, A. Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRI: effects
of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates. J. Mag. Res. Imaging. 1997. 5. pp. 933 — 937
[90] BOURLAND. JD.. NYENHUIS. JA. and SCHAEFER. DJ. Physiologic Effects of Intense MRI Gradient Fields.
Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 1999. 9 (2). pp. 363 — 377
[91]HEBRANK. FX. and GEBHARDT M. SAFE Model — a new method for predicting peripheral nerve stimulations m
MRI. Soc. Mag. Res. Im. Proceedings 2000 conference. 2000. p. 2007
[92]BOTWELL. R. and BOWLEY, L.M. Analytic calculations of the E-Fields Induced by Time-Varying Magnetic Fields
Generated by Cylindrical Gradient Coils. Mag. Res. Med.. 2000. 44. pp. 782 — 790
[93]HARVEY. PR. and MANSFIELD. P.AvoidingPeripheral Nerve Stimulation: Gradient Waveform Criteria For Optimum
Resolution in EPI. Mag. Res. Med.. 1994. 32. pp. 236 — 241
[94]MANSFIELD. P. and HARVEY. PR. Limits to Neural Stimulation in EPI. Mag. Res. Med.. 1993. 29. pp. 746 — 758
[95]FRESE. G.. HEBRANK. FX.. RENZ. W.. STORCH. T. Physikalische Parameter bei der Anwendung der MRT.
Radiologe. 1998. 38. pp. 750 — 758
[96] BUDINGER. TF.. FISCHER. H.. HENTSCHEL. D.. REINFELDER. HE.. SCHMITT. F. Physiological effects of fast
oscillating magnetic field gradients. Jour. Comp. Ass. Tech, 1991, 15. pp. 909 — 914
65