ГОСТ Р ИСО 10667-2—2015
Библиография
ш
ИСО 10075-3
Эргономические принципы обеспечения адекватности умственной нагрузки. Часть 3.
Принципы и требования к методам измерений и оценке умственной нагрузки
<ISO 10075-3) (Ergonomic principles related to mental workload. Part 3: Principles and requirements con
cerning methods for measuring and assessing mental workload)
(
2
]
ИСО 10667-1Предоставление услуг no оценке. Процедуры и методы оценки работы персонала и ор
ганизационной среды. Часть 2. Требования к заказчику
(ISO 10667-1} (Assessment service delivery. Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organi
zational settings. Part 1: Requirements for the client)
13]
ИСО 17024Оценка соответствия. Общие требования к органам, проводящим сертификацию персо
нала
(ISO 17024)(Conformity assessment. General requirements for bodies operating certitication of persons)
И]
ИСО.’МЭК 23988 Информационные технологии. Свод правил по применению информационных техноло
гий (IT) в предоставлении услуг по оценке (ISO/IEC 23988 Information technology. A code
of practice for the use of information technology (IT) in the delivery of assessments)
[5]
DIN 334302002 Профессиональная оценка сотрудников. Требования к методикам и их применению.
Berlin: Издательство Beuth
16]
AERA (1999) American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association. & National
Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
Washington DC: American Educational Research Association
[7]
APA (1985) American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association. & National
Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
Washington DC: American Psychological Association
(81
APA (1950)Ethical standards for the distribution of psychological tests and diagnostic aids. American
Psychologist. 5. pp. 620—626
(9)
Association ol Test Publishers (ATP 2002). Guidelines for computer-based testing: ATP
ПО]
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA 2005). EFPA Review Model for the Description and
Evaluation of Psychological Tests Version 3.41: Test Review Form and Notes for Reviewers,
www.efpa.eu
(И]
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA 2005). European Test User Standards for test use in
Work and Organizational settings Version 1.92.
www.efpa.eu
М2]
EVERS, A.. SUTSMA. K.. LUCASSEN. W.. & MEIJER, R.R. (2010). The Dutch review process for evaluating the
quality of psychological tests: History, procedure and results. International Journal of Testing. 10. pp. 295—317
(13]
EYDE. L.. KRUG. S.E.. ROBERTSON. G. (1993). Responsible Test Use: Case studies for assessing human be
havior. Washington. DC: APA
(14]FERNANDEZ-BALLESTEROS. R.. DE BRUYN. E.E.J., GODOY. A.. HORNKE. L.F.. TER LAAK. J., VIZCAR-
RO. C.. WESTHOFF. K., WESTMEYER. H.. & ZACCAGNINI, J.L (2001). Guidelines for the assessment process
(GAP): A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological assessment. 17, pp. 187—200
(15] HAMBLETON. R.. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and
cultures. In. R.K. Hambleton. P. Merenda. & C. Spielberger (Eds.). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests
for Cross-Cultural assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum
(
16
]
International Test Commission (ITC 2001). International Guidelines on Test Use. International Journal of Test
ing. 1. pp. 95—114
(17] International Test Commission (ITC 2006). International Guidelines on computer-based and Internet- delivered
testing. International Journal of Testing. 6. pp. 143—172
19