ГОСТ Р И С О 13824— 2013
Б ибл иограф ия
(1J ISO 13822. Bases for design of structures — Assessment of existing structures
(2) ISO 31000. Risk management — Principles and guidelines
(3) ISO/TS 16733, Fire safety engineering — Selection of design fire scenarios and design fires
Приложение A
(4) Marashl. E.. Davis, P. An argumentation-based method for managing complex issues in design of infrastructural
systems. Reliability Engineering 8 System Safety. 91.2006
[5} Perrow. C. Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press. 1999
(6] Aven. T. Foundations of risk analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. 2003
(7] Schrader-Frechette. K.S. Risk and rabonabty. Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. University of California
Press. 1991
[8] Langseth. H.. Portinale. L. Bayesian networks in reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 92. 2007
[9] Reed. W.. Mosleh. A.. Vmnem. J.E. and Aven. T. On the Use of Hybrid Causal Logic Method In Offshore Risk Analysis.
Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 94. 2009
110) Hate. A.. Kirwan. B. and Kjellen, U. Safe by design: where are we now? Safety science. 45. 2007
(11) Kroon. I.B. and Maes. M.A. Theoretical Framework for risk Assessment and Evaluation. Part of report. Risk
assessment in engineering. Joint Committee of Structural Safety. 2007
Приложение C
112) Ayyub. B.M. Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Uncertattties and Risks. CRC Press. Boca Raton. 2001
(13] Chhlbber. S.. Apostolakis. G. and Okrent. D. A Taxonomy of Issues Related to the Use of Expert Judgements.
Probabilistic Safety Studies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 38. pp. 27—45.1992
(14) Cummings. G.E. The Use of Data and Judgment in Determining Seismic Hazard and Fragilities, Nuclear Engineering
and Design. 93. pp. 275—279. 1986
{15) Grosst. P. Earthquake Damage Assessment From Expert Opinion to Fragility Curves. Proceedings of the 8th Joint
Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural RehablUty. Notre Dame, paper No. 123. 2000
(16) Kircher. C.A.. Whitman. R.V. and Holmes. W.T. HA2US Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods. Natural Hazards
Review. ASCE. 7(2), pp. 45—59. 2006
(17) Klrwin, B. A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment. Taylor & Francis. London. 1994
(18) Pat6-Cornell. E. Probability and Uncertainty л Nuclear Safety Decisions. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 93.
pp. 319—327. 1986
(19) Pate-Comell. E. Risk and Uncertainty Analysis In Government Safety Decisions. Risk Analysis. 22(3). pp. 633—646.
2002
(20) Siu. N. and Apostolakis. G.. Uncertain Data and Expert Opinions In the Assessmentofthe Unavailability ofSuppression
Systems. Fire Technology. 24(2). pp. 138— 162. 1988
(21) Winkler. R.L. and Clemen. R.T. Sensitivity of Weights In Combining Forecasts. Operations Research. 40(3).
pp. 609—614. 1992
(22) Winkler. R.L., Нога. S.C. and Baca. R.G. The Quality of Experts’ Probabilities Obtained Through Formal Elicitation
Techniques. NRC-02-88-005. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington D.C., 1992
Приложение D
(23) Klmke. A. and Renn. O. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk based, precaution based, and
discourse-based strategies. Risk Analyses. Vol. 22. No. 6. 2002
(24) German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU). 1998 annual report concerning global environmental risks
Приложение E
(25) Bommer. J.J. Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, an exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy.
Journal of Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 6. Special Issue 1. pp. 43—73. 2002
(26) Kameda. H. and Nojima, H. Simulation of risk-consistent earthquake motion. Earthquake eng. struct, dyn.. 16.
pp. 1007—1019. 1988
(27) Shmozuka. M.. Feng. M.Q.. Lee. J. and Nagnuma. T. Statistic analysis of frag4lty curves. J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE.
126(12), pp. 1224—1231.2000
(28) Singhal. A. and Kiremldjian. A S. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J. Struct. Engrg.,
ASCE. 122(12). pp. 1459—1467. 1996
Приложение G
(29) Flln. R. Sitting in the hot seat. Wiley. 1996
33