ГОСТ ISO 10993-6—2011
Библиография
m
ISO 5832-1
[
2
)
ISO 5832-2
[31
ISO 5832-3
l*\
ISO 5832-4
[5|
ISO 5832-5
(6] ISO 5832-6
1Л
ISO 5832-7
[
8
)
ISO 5832-8
19J ISO 5834-2
[10) ISO 6474
[11) ISO 7405
[12) ISO 10993-9
[13) ASTM F748
[14) ASTM F763
[15) ASTM F981
[16) ASTM F I983
Implants (or surgery — Metallic materials — Part 1: Wrought stainless steel
Implants (or surgery — Metallic materials — Part 2: Unalloyed titanium
Implants for surgery — Metallic materials— Part 3: Wrought titanium 6-alumlnnim 4-vanadium
alloy
Implants (or surgery — Metallic materials — Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy
Implants (or surgery — Metallic materials — Part 5: Wrought cobalt-chromium-tungstenmckel
alloy
Implants (or surgery— Metallic materials — Part 6: Wrought cobalt-nlckel-chromium-motyb-
denum alloy
Implants (or surgery— Metallic materials — Part 7: Forgeable and cold-formed cobalt-chromium-
nrckel-molybdenum-iron alloy
Implants (or surgery — Metallic materials — Part 8: Wrought cobalt-nlckel-chromium-motyb-
denum-tungsten-iron alloy
Implants (or surgery — Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene — Part 2: Moulded forms
Implants (or surgery — Ceramic materials based on high punty alumina
Dentistry — Precllmcal evaluation of blocompatlbillty of medical devices used in dentistry — Test
methods for dental materials
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 9: Framework for identification and quantification
of potential degradation products
Standard Practice for Selecting Generic Biological Test Methods for Materials and Devices
Standard Practice for Short-Term Screening of Implant Materials
Standard Practice (or Assessment of Compatibility of Biomaterials for Surgical Implants with
Respect to Effect of Materials on Muscle and Bone
Standard Practice (or Assessment of Compatibility of Absorbable/Resorbable Biomaterials for
Implant Applications
[17) MHLW Notification. Principles for Biological Safety Evaluation of Medical Devices: IYAKUSHIN No.0213001
(2003.02.13)
[18) Memorandum. Guidance for Specific Biological Tests relevant to the Principles issued by the MHLW Notification
No.0213001 (2003.02.13): IRYOKIKI-SHINSA No.36 (2003.3.19)
[19) COHEN. J.. Assay of Foreign-Body Reaction. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 41A. 1959, pp. 152— 166
[20) DE JONG. W.H.. BERGSMA. J.E.. ROBINSON. J.E. and BOS. R.R.M.. Tissue response to partially In vitro predeg
raded poly-L-tactide Implants. Biomaterials, 26. 2005. pp. 1781— 1791
[21) WISE. D.L.. TRANTOLO. D.J.. ALTOBELLI. D.E.. YASZEMSKI. M.J.. GRESSER. J.D., SCHWARTZ. E.R. and
DEKKER, M.. Evaluating the Biological Effects of Medical Devices. Encyclopedic Handbook of Biomaterials and
Bioengineering. 1. New York. 1995. pp. 422—424
[22) FERGUSON. A.B. Jr.. LAING, P.G.and HODGE. E.S., The Ionization of Metal Implants in Living Tissues. Journal of
Bone and Joint Surgery, 42A. 1960. pp. 77—90
[23) GERET. V.. RAHN. B.A., MATHYS. R.. STRAUMANN. F. and PERREN. S.M., In vivo Testing of Tissue Tolerance of
Implant Materials: Improved Quantitative Evaluation through Reduction of Relative Motion at the Implant Tissue
Interface, from Current Concepts of Internal Fixation of Fracture. H.K. Uhthoff (ed.). Springer Verlag. 1980
[24) GERET. V.. RAHN. B.A., MATHYS. R.. STRAUMANN. F. and PERREN. S.M.. Chapter 35: A Method for Teshng
Tissue Tolerance for Improved Quantitative Evaluation Through Reduction of Relative Motion at the Implant-Tissue
Interface. Evaluation of Biomaterials. G.D. Winter. J.L. Leray, K. de Groot (eds). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. 1980
[25) IKARASHI. Y.. TOYODA. K.. OHSAWA. N.. UCHIMA. T.. TSUCHIYA. T.. KANIWA. M.. SATO. M.. TAKAHASHI. M.
and NAKAMURA. A.. Comparative Studies by Cell Culture and In vivo Implantation Test on the Toxicity of Natural
Rubber Latex Materials. J Blomed Mater Res. 26. 1992. pp. 339—356
[26) IKARASHI. Y.. TSUCHIYA. T„ TOYODA. K.. KOBAYASHI. E.. DOI. H.. YONEYAMA. T. and HAMANAKA. H.,
Tissue Reactions and Sensitivity to Iron Chromium Alloys. Mater Trans. 43, 2002. pp. 3065—3071
[27) KAMINSKI. E.J.. OGLESBY. R.J.. WOOD. N.K. and SANDRIK.J.. The Behavior of Biological Materials at Different
Sites of Implantation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2.1968. pp. 81—88
[28) LAING. P.G.. FERGUSON. A.B. Jr. and HODGE. E.S.. Tissue Reaction In Rabbit Muscle Exposed to Metallic
Implants, J. Blomed Mater Res. 1.1967. pp. 135— 149
[29) LANGELAND. K.. GUTTUSO. J.. LANGELAND. L L. and TOBON. G.. Methods in the study of biological response to
endodontic materials. Tissue response to N2 (root canal sealer). Oral Surg. 27. 1969. p. 522
[30) PREUL. M.C., BICHARD. W.D.. MUENCH, T. and SPETZLER. R.F.. Toward optimal tissue sealants for neuro
surgery: use of a novel hydrogel in a canine durotomy repair model. Neurosurgery. 2003
[31) RAHN. B.A.. GERET. V.. CAPAUL.C.. LARDI. M. and SOLOTHURNMANN. B.. Morphometric Evaluation of Tissue
Reaction to Implants Using Low Cost Digitizing Techniques. Clinical Applications of Biomaterials. A.J.C. Lee. T.
Albrektsson and P.-l. Branemark (eds). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. 1982
[32) TILNEY. N.L., Patterns of lymphatic drainage in the adult laboratory rat, J. Anat. 109(3). 1971. pp. 369—383
16