ГОСТ Р ИСО 10667-1—2015
Библиография
(1] ИСО 10075-3, Эргономические принципы обеспечения адекватности умственной нагрузки. Часть 3.
Принципы и требования к методам измерений и оценке умственной нагрузки (ISO 10075-3 Ergonomic principles
related to mental workload — Part 3: Principles and requirements concerning methods (or measuring and assessing
mental workload)
(2] ИСО 10667-2. Предоставление услуг по оценке. Процедуры и методы оценки работы персонала и
организационной среды. Часть 2. Требования к поставщикам услуг (ISO 10667-2 Assessment service delivery —
Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings — Part 2: Requirements for service
providers)
(3] ИСО 17024, Оценка соответствия. Общие требования к органам, проводящим сертификацию персонала
(ISO 17024 Conformityassessment — General requirements for bodies operating certification of persons)
(4] ИСО/МЭК 23988. Информационные технологии. Свод правил по применению информационных
технологий (IT) в предоставлении услуг по оценке (ISO/IEC 23988 Information technology — A code of practice for the
use of information technology (FT) in the delivery of assessments)
(5] DIN 33430:2002. Профессиональная оценка сотрудников. Требования к методикам и их применению.
Berlin: Издательство Beuth (DIN 33430:2002 Requirements for procedures and their application in job related
proficiency assessment)
(6] AERA (1999). American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association. & National
Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington DC: American
Educational Research Association
(7] APA (1985). American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association, & National
Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington DC: American
Psychological Association
(8] APA (1950). Ethical standards for the distribution of psychological tests and diagnostic aids. American
Psychologist. 5. pp. 620—626
(9] Association of Test Publishers (ATP 2002). Guidelines for computer-based testing: ATP
(10] European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFP2A005). EFPA Review Model for the Description
and Evaluation of Psychological TestsVersion 3.41: Test Review Form and Notes for Reviewers,
www.efpa.eu
(11] European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA2005). European Test User Standards for Test
Use in Work and Organizational Settings Version 1.92.
www.efpa.eu
(12] EVERS. A.. SIJTSMA, K.. LUCASSEN, W.. & MEIJER. R.R. (2010). The Dutch review process for evaluating
the quality of psychological tests: History, procedure and results. International Journal of Testing. 10. pp. 295 — 317
(13] EYDE. L„ KRUG. S.E.. ROBERTSON. G. (1993). Responsible Test Use: Case studies for assessing human
behavior. Washin
[14] FERN
n. DC: APA
DEZ-BALLESTEROS, R.. DE BRUYN. E.E.J., GODOY. A.. HORNKE. L.F., TER LAAK. J,.
VIZCARRO. C.. WESTHOFF, K„ WESTMEYER. H.. & ZACCAGNINI. J.L. (2001). Guidelines for the assessment
process (GAP): A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological assessment. 17. pp. 187 — 200
[15] HAMBLETON. R.. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages
and cultures. In. R.K. Hambleton. P. Merenda. & C. Spielberger (Eds.). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for
Cross-Cultural assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum
[16] International Test Commission (ITC 2001). International Guidelines on Test Use. International Journal of
Testing. 1. pp. 95— 114
[17] International Test Commission (ITC 2006). International Guidelines on computer-based and Internet-
delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6. pp. 143 — 172
[18] Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (JCTP 2000). Rights and Responsibilities of Test Takers: Guidelines
and Expectations. Washington DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practices
[19] NIP (2004). Algemene Standaard Testgebruik. [General Standard Test Use]. Amsterdam: NIP
[20] Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) (2003). Principles for the validation and use of
personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green. OH: Author
[21] TURNER. S.M.. DEMERS. S.T.. FOX. H.R., & REED. G.M. (2001). APA’s guidelines for test user
qualifications. An executive summary. American Psychologist. 56, pp. 1099 — 1113
[22] Task Force on AC Guidelines (1989). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations.
Public Personnel Management. 18, pp. 457— 470
17