ГОСТ Р ИСО 10993-3— 2009
[50] NEUBERT. D. et al. Results of in vivo and in vitro Studies for Assessing Prenatal Toxicity. Environmental Health
Perspectives. 1986. 70. pp. 89— 103
[51] SADLER. T.W.. HORTON. W.E. and WARNER. C.W. Whole Embryo Culture: A Screening Technique for Teratogens?
Teratogenesls. Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis. 1982.2. pp. 243— 253
[52] In vitro Methods in Developmental Toxicology: Use in Defining Mechanisms and Risk Parameters. G.L. Kimmel and
DM. Kochhar (eds.). Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press. 1990
[53] In vitro Embryotoxicity and Teratogenicity Tests. F. Homburger and AH. Goldberg (eds.). Concepts in Toxicology.
Vol. 3. Karger. Basel. 1985
[54] BRENT. R.L. Predicting Teratogenic and Reproductive Risks m Humans from Exposure to Various Environmental
Agents Using In vitro Techniques and In vivo Animal Studies. Congen. Anom.. 1988.28 (Suppl.). S41— S55
[55] TSUCHIYA, T.. NAKAMURA. A.. HO. T. and TAKAHASI. A. Species Differences between Rats and Mice in the
Teratogemc Action of Ethylenethiourea: In vrvo/ln vitro Tests and Teratogenic Activity of Sera Using an Embryonic Cell
Differentiation System. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 1991.109, pp. 1— 6
[56] TSUCHIYA. T., et al. Embryo lethality of new herbicides is not detected by the mtcromass teratogen tests. Arch.
Toxicol.. 1991.65.pp. 145— 149
157] KISTLER. A.. TSUCHIYA. T.. TSUCHIYA. M .and KLAUS. M. Teratogenicity ofarotlnoids (retinoids) in vivo and Invitro.
Arch. Toxicol.. 1990.64. pp. 616— 622
[58] TSUCHYIA. T.. el al. Comparative Studies of Embryotoxic Action of Ethylenethlourea in Rat Whole Embryo and
Embryonic Cell Culture. Teratology, 1991,43. pp. 319— 324
[59] Report of the In vitro teratology task force. Organized by the Division of Toxicology. Office of Toxicological Sciences.
Center forFood Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1987,
72. pp. 200— 235
(60J BASS. R., et al. Draft guideline on detection of toxicity to reproduction for medical products. Adverse Drug React.
Toxicol. Rev.. 1991.9 (3). pp. 127— 141
[61] BROWN et al.. Screening chemicals for reproductive toxicity: the current approaches - Report and recommendations of
an ECVAM/EST workshop (ECVAM Workshop 12). ATLA, 1995.23. pp. 868— 882
[62] SPIELMANN. H.. Reproduction and development. Environmental Health Perspective. 106 (Suppl. 2), 1998.
pp. 571— 576
Литература no исследованиям с применением трансгенных животных в качестве
альтернативы исследованиям канцерогенности в течение продолжительности жизни
[63] GULEZlAN. D.. et al. Use of transgenic animals for carcinogenicity testing: considerations and implications for risk
assessment. Toxicolol. Pathol.. 2000. 28. pp. 482— 499
[64] STORER. R.D. Current status and use of short/medium term models for carcinogenicity testing of
pharmaceuticals — Scientific perspective. Toxicol. Lett., 2000.112-113. pp. 557— 566
[65] DASS. S.B.. BUCCI. T.J., HEFLICH, R.H. and CASCIANO. D A. Evaluation of the transgenic p53+/- mouse for
detecting gebotoxic liver carcinogens in a short-term bloassay. Cancer Lett., 1999.143, pp. 81— 85
[66] TENNANT. R.W.. et al. Genetically altered mouse models for identifying carcinogens. IARC Science Publications.
1999.146. pp. 123— 150
[67] MAHLER. J.F.. et al. Spontaneous and chemically Induced proliferative lesions in TG.AC transgenic and
pS3-heterozygous mice. Toxicol. Pathol.. 1998, 26. pp. 501— 511
14