ГОСТ Р 59786—2021
Библиография
[1J NCCLS. Evaluation of Lots of Dehydrated Mueller-Hinton Broth for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Proposed
Guideline. NCCLS document M32-P. Wayne. PA; NCCLS; 20011
[2] CLSI. Protocols for Evaluating Dehydrated Mueller-Hinton Agar; Approved Standard—Second edition. CLSI
document M6-A2. Wayne. PA; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 20061
[3] European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2012. Disk diffusion method (for latest version, see
http://wvov.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria’disk_drffus»on_methodotogy
)
[4] European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations
(MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution. EUCAST Definitive Document E.Def 3.1. 2000. 9 pp. 509—515
[5] CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard—Twelfth Edition.
CLSI document M02-A12. Wayne. PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015
[6] CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically: Approved
Standard—Tenth Edition. CLSI document M07-A10. Wayne. PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015
[7J Mueller J.H.. & Hinton J. A protein-free medium for primary isolation of the gonococcus and meningococcus. Proc.
Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1941. 48 p. 330
[8] Veenemans J.. Mouton J.W.. Kluytmans J.A.J.W.. Donnely R. Verhulst. C.. van Keulen. PHJ. Effect of manganese in
test media on in vitro susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii to tigecycline. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 2012. 50 pp. 3077—3079
[9] Daly J.S.. Dodge R.A.. Glew R.H.. Soja D.T.. DeLuca B.A.. Hebert S. Effect of zinc concentration in Mueller-Hinton
agar on susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35 pp. 1027—1029
[10] Morrison G.H. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 1969: (14):28A. CCRC Press. Boca Raton. Florida
[11] Fuchs P.C.. Barry A.L.. Brown S.D. Daptomycin susceptibility tests: interpretive criteria, quality control, and effect of
calcium on in vitro tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000. 38 pp. 51—58
[12] Fass R.J.. & Barnishan J. Effect of divalent cation concentrations on the antibiotic susceptibilities of non-fermenters
other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1979. 16 pp. 434—438
[13] Swenson J.M.. & Thornsberry C. Susceptibility Tests for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim by a Broth Microdilution
Procedure. Curr. Microbiol. 1978.1 pp. 89—193
[14] CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. CLSI M100S. Wayne. PA: Clinical
and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016
[15] The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Routine and extended internal quality control for
MIC determination and disk diffusion as recommended by EUCAST. Version 6.0. 2016. http^
www.eucast.org
.
[16] BarryA.L.. MillerG.H..ThornsberryC. Influence ofcation supplementson activity ofnetilmicin against Pseudomonas
aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1987. 31 pp. 1514—1518
[17] Barry A.L.. Roller L.B.. Miller G.H. Revision of standards for adjusting the cation content of Mueller-Hinton broth for
testing susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992. 30 pp. 585—589
[18] Eliopoulos G.M.. & Ebopoulos C.T. Quinolone antimicrobial agents: Activity in vitro. In Wolfson JS. Hooper DC. eds.
Quinolone Antimicrobial Agents. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1989:3:35-70
[19] Auckenthaler R., Michea-Hamzehpour M.. Pechere J.C. In vitro activity of newer quinolones against aerobic
bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1986, 17 () pp. 29—39
[20] Blaser J.. Dudley M.N., Gilbert D.. Zinner S.H. Influence of medium and method on the in vitro susceptibility of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria to ciprofloxacin and enoxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1986. 29
pp. 927—929
19