ГОСТ 32437—2013
Библиография
[1]Руководящий документ ОЭСР Test No452 «Chronic Toxicity Studies»
[2] Руководство ОЭСР Test No 116 «On the design and conduct of chronic toxicity and car
cinogenicity studies, supporting tg 451, 452, 453 table of contents»
[3]Руководство ОЭСР Test No 410 «Repeated Dose Dermal Toxicity: 21/28-day Study»
[4]Руководство ОЭСР Test No411 «Subchronic Dermal Toxicity: 90-day Study»
[5] Руководство ОЭСР Test No 19 «Guidance document on the recognition, assessment, and
use of clinical signs as humane endpoints for experimental animals used in safety evaluation
Unclassified»
[6] OECD (Rome. 1995). Report of the Consultation Meeting on Sub-chronic and Chronic Toxic-
ity/Carcinogenicity Testing.
[7] Combes RD. Gaunt. I, Balls M (2004). A Scientific and Animal Welfare Assessment of the
OECD Health Effects Test Guidelines for the Safety Testing of Chemicals under the Euro
pean Union REACH System. ATLA 32. 163-208.
[8] Barlow SM, Greig JB. Bndges JW et al (2002). Hazard identification by methods of animal-
based toxicology. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 40. 145-191.
[9] Chhabra RS. Bucher JR. Wolfe M. Portier C (2003). Toxicity characterization of environ
mental chemicals by the US National Toxicology Programme: an overview. Int. J. Hyg.
Environ. Health 206. 437-445.
[10] OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. No. xx. Guidance Document on the design
and conduct of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies [alternate: Guidance Document on
the selection of doses for use in chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies).
[11]OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 39. Draft Guidance Document on Acute
Inhalation Toxicity Testing. Version 9. March 2008.
[12] OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. TG 412, Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-
Day Study.
[13] OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. TG 413. Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-
Day Study.
[14] Carmichael NG. Barton HA. Boobis AR et al (2006). Agricultural Chemical Safety Assess
ment: A Multisector Approach to the Modernization of Human Safety Requirements. Critical
Reviews in Toxicology 36.1-7.
[15] Barton HA. Pastoor TP. Baetcke T et al (2006). The Acquisition and Application of Absorp tion.
Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion (ADME) Data in Agricultural Chemical Safety
Assessments. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 36. 9-35.
[16] Doe JE. Boobts AR. Blacker A et al (2006). A Tiered Approach to Systemic Toxicity Testing
for Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 36, 37-68.
[17]Draft consultant’s proposal. V. 8. OECD TG 452 November. 2008. 13
[18] Cooper RL, Lamb JS. Barlow SM et al (2006). A Tiered Approach to Life Stages Testing for
Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 36.69-98.
[19] OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 19. Guidance Document on the recogni
tion. assessment, and use of clinical signs as humane endpoints for experimental animals
used in safety evaluation (2000).
[20] Rhomberg. LR, Baetcke. K. Blancato. J. Bus, J. Cohen. S. Conolly, R, Dixit R. Doe. J. Ekel-
man, K. Fenner-Crisp, P. Harvey. P. Hattis. D. Jacobs. A. Jacobson-Kram. D. Lewandowski,
T. Liteplo, R, Pelkonen, O. Rice. J. Somers. D. Turturro, A. West, W. Olin, S. Issues in
the Design and Interpretation of Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Studies in Rodents:
Ap proaches to Dose Selection Crit Rev. Toxicol. 37 (9) 729 - 837 (2007).
[21] ILSI (International Life Sciences Institute) (1997). Principles for the Selection of Doses in
Chronic Rodent Bioassays. Foran JA (Ed.). ILSI Press. Washington. DC.
9