rOCTEN 15835-2013
Библиогр афия
[1]ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement meth
ods and results. Part 2 : Basic method for the determination of repeatability
and reproducibility of a standard measurement method
[Точность (правильность и прецизионность) методов и результатов из
мерений Часть 2. Основной метод определения повторяемости и вос
производимости стандартного метода измерения]
[2]ISO 5725-4:1994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement meth
ods and results. Part 4: Basic methods for the determination of the trueness
of a standard measurement method
[Точность (правильность и прецизионность) методов и результатов из
мерений Часть 4. Основные методы определения правильности стан
дартного метода измерения]
[3]ISO 5725-6:1994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement meth
ods and results. Part 6: Use in practice of accuracy values
[Точность (правильность и прецизионность) методов и результатов из
мерений. Часть 6. Использование значений точности на практике]
[4] Castegnaro М., Barek X, Fremy X М.., Lafontaine М , Sansone Е. В. and
Telling G. М. Laboratory decontamination and destruction of carcinogens in
laboratory wastes: some mycotoxins. IARC Scientific Publication No. 113,
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (France), 1991, p. 63
[5]Burdaspal P.A., Legerda T M and Gilbert X (2001) Determination of Ochra-
toxin A in Baby Foods by Immunоaffinity Column Clean-up with Liquid
Chromatography: Interlaboratory Study, Journal of AOAC International,
vol.64, 1445-1452
[6]Burdaspal P.A and Legerda T.M (2004) Determination of Ochratoxin A in
processed cereal based baby foods by immunоaffinity column clean-up with
liquid chromatography: surveillance data Alimentaria, vol. 350, 11 - 18
[7]Horwitz, \V. and Albeit, P., (2006), The Horwitz P^atio (HorRat): A Useful
Index of Method Performance with P^espect to Precision, Journal of AOAC
International, 89, 1095-1109
[8]Thompson, M , 2000, Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and
sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficien cy
testing,Analyst, 125, 385-386
23