ГОСТ Р ИСО 16017-2—2007
[28]Vandendriessche. S.. Gnepink. В.. Hollander. J. С. Th., Gielen. J. W. J., Langelaan. F. G. G. M., Saunders. K. J. and
Brown. R. H. Certification of a Reference Material for Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tenax Samplers. Analyst. 116
(1991). pp. 437— 441
[29] Brown. R. H. Diffusive sampling. Clean Air at Work. Eds. Brown. R.H.. Curtis. M.. Saunders. K.J. and Van
dendriessche. S. ЕС РиЫ. no. EUR 14214, Brussels-Luxembourg (1992). pp. 141 — 148
[30] Van Den Hoed. N.. Van Asselen. O. L. J. A computer model for calculating effective uptake rates of tube-type
diffusive air samplers. Ann. occup. Hyg.. 35 (1991). pp. 273 — 285
[31] Nordstrand, E., Kristensson. J. A computer model for simulating the performance of thick-bed diffusive samplers.
Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.. 55 (1994). pp. 935 — 941
[32] Bartley. D. L.. Doemeny. L. J. and Taylor. D. G. Diffusive monitoring of fluctuating concentrations. Am. Ind. Hyg.
Assoc. J.. 44 (1983). pp. 241 — 247
[33] Bartley. D. L. Diffusive monitoring of fluctuating concentrations using weak sorbents. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc J.. 44
(1983). pp. 879 — 885
[34]Bartley. D. L.. Woebkenberg. M. L. and Posner, J. C. Performance of thick-sorbent diffusive samplers. Ann. occup.
Hyg., 32 (1988). pp. 333 — 343
[35] Bartley. D. L., Deye, G. J. and Woebkenberg. M. L. Diffusive monitor test: performance under transient conditions.
Appl. Ind. Hyg. 2 (1987). pp. 119 — 122
[36] Posner. J. S., Moore. G. A thermodynamic treatment of passive monitors. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.. 46 (1985). pp.
277 — 285
[37] Brown, R. H„ Charlton. J.. Saunders. K. J. The development ofan improved diffusive sampler. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc.
J. . 42(1981). pp. 865 — 869
[38] Hear!. F. J.. Manning, M. P. Transient response of diffusive dosimeters. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.. 41 (1980), pp. 778
— 783
[39]Underhill. D. W. Unbaised passive sampling. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.. 44 (1983). pp. 237 — 239
[40]Hori. H.. Tanaka. I. Response characteristics of the diffusive sampler at fluctuating vapor concentrations. Am. Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. J.. 54 (1993). pp. 9 5 — 101
[41] Compton. J. R., Dwiggins. G. A.. Feigley. С. E., Ludwig. D. A. The effect of square-wave exposure profiles upon the
performance of passive organic vapor monitoring badges. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.. 45 (1984). pp. 446 — 450
[42]Tompkins. F. C. and Goldsnith. R. L. A new personal dosimeter for the monitoring of industrial pollutants. Am. Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. J.. 38 (1977). pp. 371 — 377
[43]Underhill. D. W.. Feigley. С. E. Boundary layer effect in diffusive monitoring. Anal. Chem. 63 (1991). pp. 1011 —
1013
[44]Pozzoli. L., Cottica. D. An overview of the effects of temperature, pressure, humidity, storage and face velocity.
Diffusive Sampling, an alternative approach to workplace air monitoring. Eds Berlin. A.. Brown. R. H. and Saunders. K.
J.. EC Publ No. 10555 EN. Brussels-Luxembourg (1987), pp. 119 — 130
[45] Zurlo. N.. Andreoletti. F. Effect of air turbulence on diffusive sampling. Diffusive Sampling, an alternative approach
to workplace air monitoring. Eds Berlin. A.. Brown, R. H. and Saunders. K. J.. EC Publ. No. 10555 EN. Brussels-
Luxembourg (1987). pp. 174 — 176
[46] Coleman. S. R. A tube-type diffusive monitor for sulphur dxjxide. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 44 (1983). pp. 929 — 936
[47] Palmes, E. D.. Gunnison. A. F.. Dimaltio. J.. Tomczyk. C. Personal sampler for nitrogen dioxide. Am. Ind. Hyg.
Assoc. J.. 37 (1976). pp. 570 — 577
[48] Gair. A. J.. Penkett. S. A. The effects of wind speed and turbulence on the performance of diffusion tube samplers.
Atmos. Env. 29 (1995). pp. 2529 — 2533
[49] Downing. С. E. C.. Campbell. G. W„ Bailey. J. C. A survey of sulphur dioxide, ammonia and hydrocarbon
concentrations in the United Kingdom using diffusion tubes: July to December 1992. Warren Spring Laboratory.
Stevenage. UK. Report LR 964 (1994)
[50] Ferm. M. A sensitive diffusional sampler. Institutet for Vatten och Luftvardsforskning, Sweden. Report В 1020
(1991)
[51]Pannwitz, К. H. Influence of air currents on the sampling of organic solvent vapours with diffusive samplers. In
Diffusive Sampling, an alternative approach toworkplace air monitoring. Eds. Berlin, A.. Brown. R. H. and Saunders. K.
J.. EC Publ No. 10555 EN. Brussels, Luxembourg (1987), pp. 157 — 160
[52]Mark. D.. Robertson. A.. Gibson. H„ Borzucki. G.. Cherrie. B.. Madaren. W. M. Evaluation of diffusive samplers for
monitoring toxic gases and vapours in coalmines. Institute of Occupational Medicine. Edinburgh. Report TMi’90/ 11
(1990)
[53] Matthews. T. W.. Thompson. С. V.. Wilson. D. L„ Hawthorne. A. R.. Mage. D. T. Air velodties inside domestic
environments: an important parameter for passive monitoring. Indoor air ’87 — Proc. 4,h Intern. Conf. on Indoor Air
Quality and Climate. Eds. В Seifert et al. Inst, for Water. Soil and Air Hygiene. Berlin. 1 (1987). pp. 174 — 178
[54]Plant. N. T.. Wright. M. D. European Diffusive Sampling Initiative: Pilot surveys of Sheffield. Health and Safety
Laboratory. Sheffield. Report IACS/96/1 (1996)
Laboratory. Roskiide, Denmark (1990) ISBN
[55]Troen. I., Petersen. E. L. European-windatlas. RISO National
87-550-1636-7
35