ГОСТ Р 52324—2005
[105] Pastoor. S.. Schwarz. E. and Beldie. I. P. The relative suitability of four dot matrix sizes for text presentation on
Color Television Screens. Human Factors. Vol. 25. pp. 265—272
[106] Pawlak. U. and Roll. K-F. VDTs: Setting Levels for Reflected Luminance. Siemens Review. 4/90
[107] Phillips. P. L Minimum colour differences required to recognise small object on a colour Cathode Ray Tube. Colour in
Information Technology and Visual Displays. Institute of Electronic and Radio Engineers. Pub N?61. 1985. pp.
85—91
[108] Poynter. D. Contrast sensitivity and image recognition: application to the design of visual displays. Displays.
Vol. 13. N9 1.1992
[109] Poynter. D. (1991). Contrast Sensitivity and English Letter Recognition. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society
35th Annual Meeting—1991
[110] Ripple. P. Variation of accommodation in vertical directions of gaze. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 35.
pp. 1630-1634 (1952)
[111] Rogers, S. P. and Gutmann, J. C. CRT symbol subtense requirements. Society for Information Display Digest,
pp. 166—167, 1983
[112] Rupp. B. A. and Taylor. S. E„ Retinal adaptation to non-uniform fields: average luminance or symbol luminance.
Behavior and Information Technology, Vol. 5, Nfe6. pp. 375. 1986
[113] Seibert. W. F.. Kasten. D. F. and Potter. J. R. A Study of Factors Influencing the Legibility of Televised Characters.
Journal of Society of Motion Picture and Television. Vol. 68.1959. pp. 467—472
[114] Sekiguchi. N.. Williams. D. R. and Brainard. D. H. (1993). Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic
interference fringes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10. pp. 2118—2121
[115] Shapiro. H.B. Factors Affecting the Legibility of Digits. American Psychologist. Vol. 6.1951. p. 364
[116] Sheedy. J.E.. Bailey. I.L., Fong. D.. Ostermeier. M., Stanton. S. Task performance and contrast polarity on hard copy
and video displays. Proceedings of SPIE/SPSE symposium on electronic imaging science and technology. Society
of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. Bellingham. Washington. February. 1990
[117] Sherr. S. Electronic Displays. 2nd edition. John Wiley (1993)
[118] Shurtleff. D.A. and Alexander. P.J. Legibility Criteria in Design and Selection of Data Displays for Group Viewing,
Proceedings of the Human Factors Society. 1979
[119] Snyder. H.L.. Decker. J.J., Lloyd and CJC. Dye C. Effect of image polarity on VDT task performance. Proceedings of
the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 1447—1451. 1990
[120] Soar. R. S. Height—Width Proportion and Stroke Width in Numeral Visibility. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 39.
N9 1. 1955. pp. 43-46
[121] Solomon. D. The Effect of Letter Width and Spacing on Night Legibility of Highiway Signs, Proceedings of the
Highway Research Board. 35. 1956. pp. 600—617
[122] Stein. Isidore. H. The effect of active area on the legibility of dot matrix displays. US Army Electronics Research and
Development Command. Fort Monmouth. New Jersey. 1978. (Note: active area as defined in this paper is fill factor as
defined in ISO 9241-3:1992(E))
[123] Tinker. M. A. and Patterson. D. G.. Studies of typographic factors influencing speed of reading, part VII: Variations in
color print and background. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 15. N? 3. pp. 471—479. 1931
[124] Tsubota. K. and Naramori, K. Dry Eyes and Video Display Terminals. (Letter) The New England Journal of Medicine
(Vol. 328. number 8. p. 584) Feb. 25. 1993
[125] Tumage, Jr.. Ft.E.. 1966. The Perception of Flicker In Cathode Ray Tube Displays. Information Display. May/June.
pp. 38—52
[126] Tyier. C.W. and Hamer. R.D. (1987) Meridional variations in peripheral flicker sensitivity. Journal of the Optical
Society of America A. 4. pp. 1612—1619
[127] Tyler. C.W. and Hamer. R.D. (1990). Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. IV. Validity of the Ferry-Porter law.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 7. 743—758
[128] Tyler. C.W. and Torres. J. (1972) Frequency response characteristics for sinusoidal mo\’ement in the fovea and
periphery. Perception and Psychophysics. 12. pp. 232—236
[129] Tyrrell, R.. Leibowitz. H.. 1990. The Relation of Vergence Effort to reports of visual fatigue following prolonged near
work. Human Factors. 32. 3. pp. 34—357
[130] Uhlaner. J.E. The Effects of Thickness of Stroke on the Legibility of Letters. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of
Science. Vol. 48.1941. pp. 319—324
[131] Umezu. N. et al. Specular and diffuse reflectance measurement feasibility study of ISO 9241 Part 7 method.
Displays, Vol. 19. Number 1.1998
[132] Vartabedian. A.G. The effects of letter size, case and generation method on CRT display search time. Human
Factors. 13. pp. 363—368. 1971
[133] VESA — Video Electronics Standards Association. Flat Panel Display Measurements Standard. Version 1.0. San
Jose. 1998
[134] Walter. W. G. 1953. The Living Brain. Norton, pp. 101—102
[135] Wilkins. A.. 1986. Intermittent Illumination from Visual Display Units and Fluorescent Lighting Affects Movements
of Eyes Across Text. Human Factors. Vol. 28. N9 1. pp. 75—81
104