ГОСТ РИСО 18104—2011
Библиография
(1J Bakken. S.. et al. Onthe path toward a reference terminology fornursingconcepts. In International Medical Informatics
Association Working Group
6
Conference on Natural Language and Medical Concept Representation. Phoenix,
Arizona: IMIA. 1999
(2] Mortensen, RA.. ed. ICNP and telematic applications for nurses in Europe: The Telenurse experience.
Vol. 61 — Studies m Health Technology and Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 1999
13] Coenen. A., et al.. Collaborative efforts for representing nursing concepts In computer-based systems: International
perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2001. vol.
8
. no.3. pp. 202—211
(4] Hardoker. NR. and Rector. AL. Modeling nursingterminology usingthe GRAIL representation language. Journal of the
American Medical Informatics Association. 1998. vol. 5. no.1. pp. 120—128
(5] Hardiker. NR.. Hoy. D. and Casey. A. Standards fornursing terminology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics
Association. 2000. vol. 7. no.
6
. pp. 523—528
(
6
] Nielsen. GH. and Mortensen. RA. The architecture for an International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP).
International Nursing Review. 1996. vol. 43. no.
6
. pp. 175—182
(7] Ozbolt. JG. Terminology standards for nursing, collaboration at the summit. Journal of the American Medical
Informatics Association, 2000. vol. 7. no.
6
. pp. 517—522
(
8
} Bakken. S., et al.. An evaluation of the utility of the CEN Categoriat Structure for Nursing Diagnoses as a terminology
model for Integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED. In Medlnfo 2001. Proceedings of the 10th World
Congress on Medical Informatics, edited by V. Patel. R. Rogers, and R. Haux. London: IOS Press. 2001
(9] Bakken. S.. et al. Evaluation of the ClinicalLOINC specification as a terminology model forstandardized assessments.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2000, vol. 7. no.
6
. pp. 529—538
(10] ISO 17115:2007 Health Informatics — Vocabulary on terminological systems
(11] International Councilof Nurses. ICNP Update — Beta 1Version. International Councilof Nurses:Geneva. Switzerland.
International Council of Nurses. 1999. pp. 1—8
(12] Hwang. J-l. An evaluation ofthe utilityof the CEN categoriat structurefor nursing diagnoses as a terminology model for
representing nursing diagnostic concepts. 2001. Unpublished manuscript
(13] Hardiker. NR. and Rector. AL. Structural validation of nursing terminologies. Journal of the American Medical
Informatics Association. 2001. vol.
8
. no.3. pp. 212—221
(14] International Council of Nurses. ICNP International Classification of Nursing Practice Beta. Geneva. Switzerland:
International Council of Nurses. 1999
(15] Bakken, S.. et al. An evaluation of ICNP Intervention axes as terminology model components. In Proceedings of the
American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, edited by M. Overhage. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania:
Hanley and Belfus. Inc. 2000. pp. 42—46
(16] Chute. CG.. Cohn. SP. and Campbell. JR. A framework forcomprehensive terminology systems in the United States.
Development guidelines, cnteria for selection, and public policy Implications. ANSI Healthcare Informatics Standards
Board Vocabulary Working Group and the Computer-based Patient Records Institute Working Group on Codes and
Structures. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 1998. vol. 5. no.
6
. pp. 503—510
(17] Cimmo. JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies In the twenty-first century. Methods of Information In
Medicine. 1998. vol. 37. no.4—S. pp. 394—403
(18] College of American Pathologists. SNOMED Clinical Terms Concept Modeling Style/Authoring Guide. Northfield.
Illinois: CAP. 2001
(19] Martin. KS. and Scheet. NJ. The Omaha System. Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders. 1992
(20] Saba. VK. Home Health Care Classification. Caring Magazine. 1992. vol. 11, no.4. pp. 58—60
(21] Button. P.. etal. Development of the Loose Cannon Model for nursing intervention. In Nursing Informatics 2000. One
Step Beyond: The Evolution of Technology and Nursing — Proceedings of the 7th IMIA International Conference on
Nursing Use of Computers and Information Science, edited by V. Saba, et al. Auckland, New Zealand: Adis
International, 2000. pp. 350—354
(22] Henry. SB. and Mead. CN. Nursing classification systems: Necessary but not sufficient forrepresenting "what nurses
do’ forinclusion In computer-based patient record systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,
1997. vol. 4. no.3. pp. 222—232
(23] Bakken. S.. et al. Representing nursing activities within a concept-based termmologic system: evaluation of a type
definition. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2000. vol. 7, no.1. pp. 81—90
(24] Bakken. S.. Cashen. MS. and O’Brien. A. Evaluation of a type definition for representing nursing activities within a
concept-oriented termInoioglc system. In 1999American Medical InformaticsAssociation Annual Symposium. Journal
of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium Supplement edited by N. Lorenzi. Philadelphia, PA.
Hanley and Belfus. Inc. 1999
(25] McCloskey. JC. and Bulechek. GM. Nursing Interventions Classification. 3rd ed. St. Louis. С. V. Mosby. 2000
(26] Health Level 7. Health Level 7 Reference Information Model Version 01-07. Ann Arbor. Ml: Health Level 7. 2000
(27] ISO 1087-1.2000, Terminology work — Vocabulary — Part 1: Theory and application
23