ГОСТ IEC 62127-1—2015
[55] Smith R.A. Are hydrophones of diameter 0.5 mm small enough to charactense diagnostic ultrasound equipment?
Phys. Med. Biol. .
1989. vol. 34. p. 1593—1607
[56] Selfridge A. and Lewin P A Wideband Spherically Focused PDVF Acoustic Sources for Calibration of Ultrasound
Hydrophone Probes.
IEEE Trans. Ullrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Conlr..
November 2000. vol. 47. iss. 6. p. 1372—1376
[57] Radulescu E.G.. Lewin P.A.. Goldstein A. and Nowicki A. Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1 — 40
MHz.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr..
November 2001. vol. 48. iss. 6. p. 1575— 1580
[58] Radulescu E.G.. Wojcik J., Lewin PA. and Nowicki A. Nonlinear propagation model for ultrasound hydrophones cal
ibration in the frequency range up to 100 MHz.
Ultrasonics.
June 2003. vol.41. iss. 4. p. 239—245
[59] Radulescu E.G.. Lewin P.A. and Nowicki A. 1 — 60 MHz Measurements in Focused Acoustic Fields using Spatial
Averaging Corrections.
Ultrasonics.
May 2002. vol.40. iss. 1—8. p. 497—501
[60] Lewin P.A.. Barrie-Smith N.. Hynynen K.. Ide M. and MacDonald M. Interlaboratory Acoustic Power Measurement.
J. Ultrasound in Medicine.
2003. vol. 22. p. 207—213
[61] Radulescu E.G.. Lewin P.A.. Wojcik J. and Nowicki A. A Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz
using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
Ultrasonics.
June 2003. vol.41, iss. 4. p. 247—254
[62] Smith R.A.
The evaluation ofsmall area hydrophones
[NPL Report RSA{EXT)2]. Teddirvgton. Middlesex. UK: Nation
al Physical Laboratory. 1989
[63] Hekkenberg R.T.. Beissner K.. Zeqiri B., Bezemer R.A. and Hodnett M. Validated ultrasonic power measurements up
to 20 W.
Ultrasound Med. Biol..
2001. vol. 27. no. 3. p. 427—438
[64] Hekkenberg R.T.. Beissner K. and Zeqiri В
Therapy-level ultrasonic power measurement.
Final Technical Report.
EC project SMT4-CT96-2139. European Commission report EUR 19510. 2000. ISBN 92-828-9027-9
[65] Hekkenberg R.T.. Beissner K. and Zeqiri B.
Guidance on propagation medium and degassing for ultrasonic power
measurements in the range of physiotherapy-level ultrasonic power.
EC project SMT4-CT96-2139, European Com
mission report EUR 19511. 2000. ISBN 92-828-9838-5.
[
66
]
Radulescu E.G., Lewin P.A.. Wojcik J. and Nowicki A. Probing acoustic fields of clinically relevant transducers: the ef fect
of hydrophone probes’ finite apertures and bandwidths.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr..
October 2004.
vol. 51. iss. 10. p. 1262—1270
[67] Duck F A and Starritt H.C. Acoustic shock generation by ultrasonic imaging equipment.
Brit. J. Radiol..
1984. vol. 57.
p. 231—240
[
68
]
Hekkenberg R.T.. Oosterbaan W A . McCarty K. and Mead D.
Acoustic output and related performance o f 5 duplex
scanners. A71
UM-9. ESAOTE SIM 5000. HITACHI EUB-450. QUANTUM QAD-PV. VINGMED CFM-700.
Report:
MTD/90.033. June 2990/
Дополнение: докутиенты IEC, касающиеся настоящего стандарта
[69] IEC 60469-1:1987
[70] IEC 60601-2-37
[71]
IEC 61161:2006
Pulse techniques and apparatus
—
Part 1: Pulse terms and definitions
(Импульсная техника и
аппаратура. Часть 1: Термины и определения импульсов)
Medical electrical equipment
—
Part 2-37: Particular requirements for the safety of ultrasonic
medical diagnostic and monitoring equipment
(Медицинское электрическое оборудование.
Часть 2-37. Частные требования безопасности для приборов ультразвуковой диагностики и
исследований)
Ultrasonics
—
Power
measurement —
Radiation force balances and performance requirements
(Ультразвук. Измерения мощности. Системы уравновешивания радиационной силы и тре
бования к их характеристикам)
57