ГОСТ IEC 62127-1—2015
Библиография
[1] Radulescu E.G.. Lewin P.A., Nowicki A. and Berger W.A. Hydrophones’ effective diameter measurements as a qua-
si-continuous function of frequency.
Ultrasonics.
2003. vol. 41 iss. 8. p. 635—641
[2] Bacon D.R. Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound.
Ultrasound f/ed. Biol..
1984.
vol. 10. no. 2. p. 189—195
[3] ISOflEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measure
ment (GUM:1995)
[4]Beissner K. Maximum hydrophone size in ultrasonic field measurements.
Acuslica.
1985. vol. 59. p. 61—66
[5] Harris G.R. Transient field of a baffled planar piston having an arbitrary vibration amplitude distribution.
J. Acoust.
Soc. Am..
1981. vol. 70. p. 18&-204
[6] Fay B. Numerische Berechnung der Beugungsverluste im Schallfeld von Ultraschaltwandlern.
Acustica.
1976.
vol. 36. p. 209—213
[7] Khimunin A.S. On the ultrasound diffraction losses for circular transducers of different radii.
Acustica.
1983, vol. 54.
p. 13—22
[8] Harris G.R. A model of the effects of hydrophone and amplifier frequency response on ultrasound exposure measure
ments.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr..
September 1991. vol. 38, iss 5. p. 413—417
[9] Hams G.R. Are current hydrophone low frequency response standards acceptable for measunng mechanical/cavita-
tion indices?
Ultrasonics.
1996. vol. 34. iss. 6. p. 649—654
[10] Lewin PA., Schafer M.E. and Chivers R.C. Factors affecting the choice of preamplification for ultrasonic hydrophone
probes.
Ultrasound Med. Biol..
March 1987. vol. 13. no. 3. p. 141—148
[11] Preston R.C., Bacon D.R.. Livett AJ. and Rajendran K. PVDF membrane hydrophone performance properties and
their relevance to the measurement of the acoustic output of medical ultrasonic equipment.
J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum.,
1983. vol. 16. p. 786—796
[12] Smith RA. The importance of the frequency response of a hydrophone when characterising medical ultrasonic fields.
Proc. Inst. Acoustics.
1986. vol. 8. Part 2. p. 119—128
[13] Lewin P.A. Calibration of Hydrophones.
Technical Rewiew,
Bruel and Kjaer, 1973. vol. 1. p. 3— 17
[14] Preston R.C.. Bacon D.R. and Smith R.A. Calibration of medical ultrasonic equipment — procedures and accuracy
assessment.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr..
March 1988. vol.35, iss. 2. p. 110— 121
[15] Harris G.R. Hydrophone measurements in diagnostic ultrasound fields.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Con
tr..
March 1988. vol.35. iss. 2. p. 87—101
[16] Shombert D.G. and Harris G.R. Use of miniature hydrophone to determine peak intensities typical of medical ultra
sound devices.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr..
May 1986. vol.33. iss. 3, p. 287—294
[17] AIUM’NEMA.
Acoustic output measurement standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment.
(NEMA Standards Pub
lication UD 2-2004, Revision 3). Laurel. MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM); Rosslyn. VA: Na
tional Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). 2004
[18] Zeqiri B. and BondA.D. The influence ofwaveform distortion on hydrophone spatial-averaging corrections — Theory
and measurement.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am..
1992. vol. 92, p. 1809— 1821
[19] EC Community Bureau of Reference (BCR). Development
of standard measurement methods for essential prop
erties of ultrasound therapy equipment
(TNO Report CMT/92.031). Leiden. The Netherlands: Centre for Medical
Technology. 1992
[20] Hekkenberg R.T.. Reibold R. and Zeqiri B. Development of standard measurement methods for essential properties
of ultrasound therapy equipment.
Ultrasound fAed. Biol.,
1994. vol. 20. no. 1. p. 83—98
[21] Staundenraus J. and Eisenmenger W. Fiber-optic hydrophone for ultrasonicand shockwave measurements in water.
Ultrasonics.
1993. vol. 31, iss. 4. p. 267—273
[22] Wilkens V. and Koch C. Amplitude and phase calibration of hydrophones up to 70 MHz using broadband pulse exci
tation and an optical reference hydrophone.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am..
2004. vol. 115. p. 2892—2903
[23] Lewin PA. Umchid S.. Sutin A. and SarvazyanA. Beyond 40 MHz frontier: the future technologies for calibration and
sensing of acoustic fields.
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser..
2004. vol. 1. p. 38—43
[24] Lewin P.A. and Chivers R.C. Two miniature ceramic ultrasonic probes.
J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum..
1981. vol. 14,
p. 1420— 1424
[25] Shombert D.G.. Smith S.W. and Harris G.R. Angular response of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones.
Med. Physics.
July-August 1982. vol. 9. no. 4. p. 484— 492
[26] Lewin P.A. Miniature piezoelectric polymer ultrasonic hydrophone probes.
UHrasontcs,
September 1981. vol. 19.
iss. 5. p. 213—216
[27] Wilson D.T.. Tancrell R.H. and Callerame
J.
PVF2 polymer microprobe.
Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Sym
posium.
1979. p.506—510
55