ГОСТ Р МЭК 62220-1-3— 2013
Библиография
(1| ICRU Report 54:1996. Medical Imaging - The Assessment of Image Quality
(2] ISO/IEC Guide 98:1995. Guice to the expression of uncertainty in measurement
(3] METZ. EC.. WAGNER. RF., DOI. K.. BROWN, OG.. NISMIKAWA. RM.. MYERS. KJ Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of
medical imaging systems. Med. Phys.. 1995. 22. p.p.1057 - 1061
(4] Handbook of medical imaging. Vol. 1: Physics and Psychophysics. Editors BEUTEL. J. KUNOEL, HL.. VAN METTER. RL . SPIE 2000
(5| TAPIOVAARA. MJ. and WAGNER. RF. SNR and DOE analysis of broad spectrum X-ray imaging. Phys Med. Biol., 1985. 30. p.p. 519
- 529, and corrigendum Phys. Med. Biol 1988. 31. p.195
(6] CUNNINGHAM. IA, and FENSTER. A. A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for
finite-element differentiation. Med.Phys. 14. 1987, p.p. 533 - 537
(7] SPEVAL software package version of Jan. 1995 <H. Kramer of PTB)
(8] ILES. WJ. Computation of bremsstrahlung X-ray spectra over an energy range 15 keV to 300 keV. National Radiological Protection
Board Report 204. London, HMSO. 1987
(9] HIGGINS. PD. et al. Mass Energy-Transfer and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients. Including In-Flight Positron Annihilation for
Photon Energies IkeV to 100MeV. NISTIR 4812. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg USA (1992)
(10] BERGER. MJ. and HUBBELL, JH. XCOM Photon Cross Sections Database. NIST Standard Reference Database 8, National Institute
of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg USA
(11] P. R. GRANFORS and R. AUFRICHT1G. DQE(f) of an amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector detector parameter influences and
measurement methodology Proc. SPIE 3977. 2 - 13 (2000)
(12] 8 MENSER. R.J.M.H. BASTIAENS. A. NASCETTI, M. OVERDICK and M. SIMON. Linear system models for lag in flat dynamic x ray
detectors. Proc SPIE 6745, 430 - 441 (2005)
(13] M. OVERDICK.
T.
SOLF and H.-A WISCHMANN. Temporal artefacts in Hat dynamic x-ray detectors. Proc SPIE 4320,47 - 58 (2001)
(14] E BUHR. S. G0NTHER-KOHFAHL. U. NEITZEL Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer func
tion of a digital radiographic system from an edge image Med Phys 30. 2323 - 2331 (2003).
(15] S. R. DOOLEY and A. K. NANDI. Notes on the Interpolation of Discrete Periodic Signals using Sine Function Related Approaches.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING. VOL. 48. NO. 4. 1201 - 1203 (April 2000)
(18] IEC 62220-1.2003. Medical electrical ecuipment - Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices - Part 1: Determination of the
detectrvc quantum efficiency
(17] IEC 62220-1-2:2007. Medical electrical equipment - Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices - Part 1-2: Determination of the
detective quantum efficiency - Detectors used in mammography
DAINTY. JC. and SHAW. R Image Science. Academic Press. London 1974. ch. 5, p. 153
DAINTY. JC. and SHAW. R Image Science. AcademicPress. London 1974. ch.8. p 312
OAINTY. JC. and SHAW. R. Image Science. Academic Press. London 1974, ch 8. p. 280
SHAW. R. The Equivalent Quantum Efficiency of the Photographic Process. J. Phys. Sc.. 1963, 11. p.p.199 - 204
STIERSTORFER. K,, SPAHN. M. Seif-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of X-ray detec
tors Med. Phys.. 1999, 26 p p.1312 - 1319
HILLEN. W . SCHIEBEL. U.. ZAENGEL. T. Imaging performance of digital phosphor system. Med Phys., 1987. 14. p.p. 744 - 751
CUNNINGHAM. IA.. m Standard for Measurement of Noise Power Spectra.
ЛЛ
РМ Report December 1999
SAMEI. E.. FLYNN. MJ.. RElMANN. D A. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test
device Med. Phys.. 1998. 25. p.p. 102 - 113
CUNNINGHAM.1A.: Degradation of the Detective Quantum Efficiency due lo a Non-Unity Detector Fill Factor. Proceedings SPIE. 3032,
1997. p.p. 22 -3 1
SIEWERDSEN. JH.. ANTONUK. LE.. EL-MOHRI, Y . YORKSTON. J.. HUANG. W.. and CUNNINGHAM. IA. Signal, noise power spec
trum. and detective quantum ef6ctency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. Med. Phys.. 1998. 25, p.p. 814
-6 2 8
DOBBINS III. JT. Effects of undersamplmg on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise
equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. Med. Phys. 1995, 22. p.p.171 - 181
DOBBINS III JT.. ERGUN. DL..RUTZ. L.. HINSHAW. DA , BLUME.H.. and CLARK. DC DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiog
raphy acquisition devices. Med. Phys.. 1995. 22. p.p. 1581 - 1593
SAMEI. E,. FLYNN. M.J., CHOTAS, H.G.. DOBBINS III. J .T DOE of direct and indirect digital radiographic systems. Proceedings of SPIE.
Vol. 4320. 2001. p.p. 189 - 197
IEC 81262-5:1994. Medical electrical equipment - Characteristics of electro-optical X-ray image intensifiers - Part 5 Determination of the
detective quantum efficiency
ISO 12233:2000. Photography - Electronic std-picture cameras - Resolution measurements
ISO 15529.2007 Optics and photonics - Optical transfer function - Principles of measurement of modulation transfer function (MTF) of
sampled imaging systems
ICRU Report 41. 1986: Modulation Transfer Function of Screen-Film-Systems.
23