ГОСТ Р МЭК 62127-2—2009
{29] Pinkerton J. М. М. The absorption of ultrasonic waves and liquids and its relation to molecular constitution. Proc. Phys.
Soc.. 1949. vol. 62. p. 129—141
(30) CorbettS.S. The influence ofnonlinearfieldson miniature hydrophone calibration using the planarscanning technique.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelactr. Freq. Contr.. March 1988. vol. 35. iss. 2. p. 162—167
{31] Radulescu E.G.. Lewm P.A., Goldstein A. and Nowickl A. Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1—40 MHz.
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelactr Freq. Contr.. November 2001, vol. 48. iss. 6. p. 1575—1580
(32) Radulescu E.G.. Lewm P.A and Nowickl A. 1—60 MHz Measurements In Focused Acoustic Fields using Spatial
Averaging Corrections. Ultrasonics. May 2002. vol. 40. Iss. 1-8. p. 497—501
{33] AIUMSNEMA. Safety standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. (AIUM/NEMA Standard Publication No. UL 1-
1981). Laurel M.D.: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM); Rosstyn V.A.: National Electrical
Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
{34] Bacon D.R., A new method for ultrasonic hydrophone calibration. 1982 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.
1982. p. 700—704
{35] Lockviood J.C., Muir T.G. and Blackstock D.T. Directive harmonic generation in the radiation field of a circular piston.
J.Acoust. Soc. Am.. 1973. vol. 53. p. 1148—1153
{36] Del Grosso V.A. and MaderC.W. Speed ofsound mpurewater. J.Acoust. Soc. Am.. 1972.vol. 52. p. 1442—1446
{37] Bilaniuk N. and Wong G.S.K. Speed of sound in pure water as a function of temperature. J. Acousf. Soc. Am.. 1993.
vol. 93. p. 2306
(38] Radulescu E.G.. Wojdk J.P.. Lewm P.A. and Nowickl A Nonlinear propagation model for ultrasound hydrophones
calibration in the frequency range up to 100 MHz. Ultrasonics. June 2003. vol. 41. iss. 4. p. 239—245
(39] Radulescu E.G..Lewln P.A.. Wojclk J. P.and Nowickl A. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz
using time gating frequencyanalysis and finite amplitude waves. Ultrasonics. June 2003. vol. 41.«ss.4. p. 247—254
(40] Bleeker H.J. and Lewin P.A. A new method of ultrasonic hydrophone calibration using KZK wave modeling. J. Acousf.
Soc. Am.. 1998. vol. 103. p. 2962
(41] Bleeker H.J. and Lewin P.A. A novel method for determining calibration and behaviorof PVDF ultrasonic hydrophone
probes In the frequency range up to 100 MHz. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr.Freq. Confr.. November 2000,vol. 47.
iss. 6. p. 1354—1362
(42] Lewm P.A., Umchld S.. Sutin A. and Sarvazyan A. Beyond 40 MHz frontier: the future technologies for calibration and
sensing of acoustic fields. J. Phys.. Conf. Sen. 2004. vol. 1. p 38—43
(43] Reibold R. and Molkenstruck W. Investigation of putse-excited hydrophones for ultrasonic field measurements using
laser Interferometry. Ultrasonics. March 1987. vol. 25. iss. 2. p. 114—118
(44] Scruby C.B. and Drain L. E. Laser Ultrasonics. Techniques and Applications. Bnstol: Adam Hilger. 1990.
(45] Koch Ch„ Ludwig G. and Molkensteuck W. Calibration of an interferometric fiber tip sensor for ultrasound detection.
Ultrasonics. June 1997. vol. 35. iss. 4, p. 297—303
(46] Koch Ch. and Molkensteuck W. Pnmary calibration of hydrophones with extended frequency range 1to 70 MHz using
optical Interferometry. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr.. September 1999. vol. 46, Iss. 5. p. 1303—1314
(47] Bacon D.R. Primary calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone using optical Interferometry IEEE Trans. Ultrason.
Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr. March 1988. vol. 35. iss. 2. p. 152—161
(48] Bacon D.R. and RobinsonS.P. Intercomparisonof 1 mmhydrophonecalibrations Inthe frequencyrange0.5 to 15MHz.
(Report EUR 13525 EN). Bureau Communautatre de Reference. Commission of the European Communities.1991
(49] Robinson S.P.. Bacon D.R.and Moss В C. The measurement ofthe frequency response ofa photodiode and amplifier
using an opto-mechanical Frequency response calibrator. Meas. Sci. Techno!.. 1990. vol. 1. p. 1184—1187
(50] Esward T.J. and Robinson S.P. Extending the frequency range of the National Physical Laboratory primary standard
laserInterferometerfor hydrophonecalibrations to 80 MHz. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr.. May 1999,
vol. 46. iss. 3. p. 737—744
(51] Preston R.C.. Bacon D.R.. Livett A.G. and Rajendran K. PVDF membrane hydrophone performance properties and
their relevance to the measurementof the acoustic output of medical ultrasonic equipment. J. Phys. E: Scl. Instrum..
Vol. 16. p. 786—796
(52] Smith R.F. and Bacon D.R. A multiple-frequency hydrophone calibration technique. J.Acoust. Soc. Am.. 1990. vol. 87.
p. 2231—2243
(53] Bacon D.R. Nonlinear acoustics in ultrasound calibration and standards. In Hamilton M.F. and Blackstock D.T.. eds..
Frontiers of nonlinear acoustics. 12th ISNA. Elsevier. 1990, p. 3—19
(54] Harris G.R. and Shombert D.G. A pulsed near-field technique formeasuring the directional characteristics ofacoustic
receivers. IEEE Transactions on Somes and Ultrasonics. 1985, vol. 32. no. 6. p. 802—808
55