ГОСТ Р МЭК 62127-2—2009
Библиография
[1] Harris G.R. Are current hydrophone low frequency response standards acceptable for measuring
mechanicalicavitatlon indices? Ultrasonics. 1996. vol. 34. iss. 6, p. 649—654
[2] Belssner K. Maximum hydrophone size in ultrasonic field measurements. Acustlca. vol. 59, p. 61—66
[3] ISO Guttle to the expression of uncertainty In measurement. Geneva. Swilzertand. 1995
[4] Fay B.. Lewm P.A . Ludwig G., SesslerG.M. and Vang G. The Influence ofspatial polarizationdistribution on spotpoled
PVDF membrane hydrophone performance. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 1992. vol. 18. no. 6—7. p. 625—635
[5] Radulescu E.G., Wojcik J.. Lewm P.A.. Nowickl A. and Berger W.A. The Influence of finite aperture and frequency
response of ultrasonic hydrophone probes on the determination of acoustic output. Ultrasonics. Apnl 2004. vol. 42. iss.
1—9, p. 367—372
[6] Radulescu E.G., Lewln P.A.. Nowickl A. and Berger W.A. Hydrophones effective diameter measurements as a
quasi-contmuoue function of frequency. Ultrasonics. 2003. vol. 41, Iss. 8. p. 635—641
[7] Radulescu E.G..WojcikJ.Lewm P.A. and Nowickl A. Probing acousticfieldsofclinicallyrelevanttransducers: theeffect
ofhydrophone probes finite apertures and bandwidths. IEEE Trans. Ultra son. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr., October2004.
vol. 51. Iss. 10. p. 1262—1270
(8J Harris G.R.. Gammell P.A.. Radulescu E.G. and Lewm P.A. Interlaboratory evaluation of hydrophone sensitivity
calibration from 0.1 to 2 MHz via time delay spectrometry. Ultrasonics. April 2004, vol. 42. iss. 1—9. p. 349—353
[9] BelssnerK. Ontheplane-waveapproximationofacoustic intensity.J.Acoust. Sos.Am.. 1982. vol. 71, p. 1406— 1411
[10J Belssner K. Radiation force and force balanced. In Zlskm M.C. and Lewm P.A.. eds.. Ultrasonic Exposlmetry. Boca
Raton: CRC Press. 1992. p. 127—142
[11] Fick. S.E. The NIST power reference source. In Ziskin. M.C. and Lewln. P.A.. eds.. Ultrasonic Exposlmetry. Boca
Raton: CRC Press. 1992. Ch. 6. p. 169—183
[12] Beyer R.T. Nonlinear Acoustics. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1975
[13] Carstensen E.L. and Muir T.G. The role of nonlinear acoustics in biomedical ultrasound. In Greenleaf. J.. ed..
Ultrasound Tissue Characterization. Boca Ration. CRC Press. 1986,Ch. 3. p. 57—79
[14] Bjorno L. and Lewm P.A. Measurement of BfA parameter In tissues. In Greenleaf. J.. ed.. Ultrasound Tissue
Characterization. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1986, Ch. 6. p. 141—163
[15] Lewln P.A. Practical implementations and technology of measurement devices. In Ziskin M.C. and Lewm P.A.. eds..
Ultrasonic Exposimetry. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1992. Ch. 7. p. 185—215
[16] Duck F.A. and Martin K. Exposure values for medical devices. In Ziskin M.C. and Lewin P.A.. eds.. Ultrasonic
Exposimetry. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1992. Ch. 11. p. 315—344
[17] Bacon D.R. Characteristics ofa PVDF membrane htdrophone for use in the range 1—100 MHz. IEEE Transactions on
Somes and Ultrasonics. January 1982, vol. SU-29. no. 1. p. 18—25
[18] Lewln P.A. Linearity ofthe polymerprobes. Proc. WFUMB Sydney. Elmsford N.Y.: Pergamon Press. 1985.p. 537
[19] Kraynak T.. Schafer M.E. and KrakhmanV. Development of a cost-effective shock wave hydrophone. 1994 IEEE
Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, p. 1805—1808
[20] Dodick J.M. Surgical instrument with inputpower transducer. US Patent №. 5324282
[21] Lewin P.A.. Bhatia R.. Zhang Q. and Dodick J. Characterization of optoacousbc surgical devices. IEEE Ultrasonics
Symposium. 1995
[22] SchaferM.E. Techniques ofhydrophone calibration. InZlskm M.C. and Lewm P.A.. eds.. UltrasonicExposimetry. Boca
Raton: CRC Press. 1992. Ch. 8. p. 217—255
[23] Tner H.G. Ultrasonic devices for surgery (cataract removal and viterectomy) In ophthalmology. J. d’Echographle Med.
Uttrasonore. 1985. vol. 1. p. 17—23
[24] Belssner K. Schallfelduntersuchungen an ophthalmologisch-chirurglschen Ultraschallgeraeten. In Fortschntte der
Akustik — DAGA 80. Berlin: VDE-Verlag. 1980. p. 567—570
[25] Schafer M.E. and Broadwln A. Acoustical characterization of ultrasonic surgical devices. 1994 IEEE Ultrasonics
Symposium Proceedings. 1994, p. 1903—1906
[26] Meeks S. and Ting R. The evaluation ofstaticand dynamic stresson the piezoelectricand dielectricpropertiesof PVDF.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.. 1984. Vol. 75. p. 1010
[27] Tancrell R.H.. Wilson D.T. and Ricketts D. Properties of PVDF polymer for sonar, f 985 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
Proceedings. 1985. p. 624—627
[28] Herman В.A. and Harris G.R. Calibration ofminiature ultrasonic receiversusing a planarscanning technique. J. Acoust.
Soc. Am., 1982. vol. 72. p. 1357—1363
54