ГОСТ Р 55651—2013
Библиография
[1] ISO 1183-1, Plastics — Methods fordetermining the density ofпоп-cellular plastics — Part 1. Immer
sion method, liquid pyknometormethod and titration method
[2] ISO 3336. Dentistry — Syntheticpolymer teeth
[3] ISO 4049. Dentistry — Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting matenals
[4] ISO 10477. Dentistry — Polymer-based crown and bridge materials
[5] DIN EN 60672-3. Ausgabe: 1999-02, Keramik- und Glasisolierstoffe — Teil 3: Anforderungen fur
einzelne Werkstoffe
[6] ASTM G40—99. Standard terminology relating to wear and erosion
[7] DIN EN 50 320. Dig/tales Tonrundfunksystem — Spezifikation dos DAB-Befehlssatzes furEmpf&ngor
(DCSR)
[8] L.H. Mair. Wear in dentistry — Current terminology. J. Dent.. 20 (1992) pp. 140—144
[9] L.H. Mair. T.A. Stolarski, R.W. Vowles. C.H. Lloyd. Wear: mechanisms, manifostattons and measure
ment. Report of a workshop. J. Dent. 24 (1996) pp. 141—148
1 Метод испытания — ДИН
[10] Bieda A.. Experimented Untersuchung zum Verschleissverhalten von drei Soitenzahnkompositen
gegen eine Aluminiumoxidkeramik. Mod. ThesisAnke Bieda. Mainz (1996)
2 Метод испытания — ACTA
[11] Pallav P., Davidson C.L.. De Gee A.J., Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under
stress-bearing conditions. J. Prosthet. Dent. 59(4) (1988) pp. 426—429
[12] De Gee A.J.. Pallav P.. Occlusal wear simulation with theACTAwear machine. J. Dent. 22 (Suppl. 1)
(1994) pp. 21—27
3 Метод испытания — Цюрих
[13] Krejci I.. Reich T.. Lutz R. Albertoni M. /л-wVo-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurations-
systeme. I.Computergesteuerter Kausimulator. Schweiz. Monatsschr. Zahnmed.. 100 (1990). pp. 953—960
[14] Lutz R, Krejci I. and Barbakow R. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel
cusps. J. Dent. Res.. 71(8) (1992) pp. 1525—1529
[15] Krejci I.. Lutz R and Zedler C.. Effect of contact area size of enamel and composite wear. J. Dent
Res.. 71 (7) (1992) pp. 1413—1416
[16] Krejci I.. Albert R. Lutz R. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J. Dent Res.. 78(2)
(1999). pp. 713—719
4 Метод испытания — Алабама
[17] Shiro Suzuki. Leinfelder K.R. An in vivo evaluation of a copolymerizable type of microfilled compos
ite resin. Quintessence Int.. 25 (1994) pp. 59—64
[18] Leinfelder K.R. R.W. Beaudreau. R.B. Mazer. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintes
sence Int.. 20 (1989) pp. 755—761
5 Метод испытания — Фрайбург
[19] Soltesz U.. Klaiber В., Comparison of different abrasion processes in dental restorative materials. In
Biomaterials and Biomechanics (1983). Elsevier Sci. Publ.. Amsterdam. 1984. pp. 457—462
[20] Sattler J.. Soltesz U.. Klaiber B.. Simulation desAbriobs durchAntagonistenkontakt. Fraunhofer-ln-
stitut fur Werfcstoffmechanik Freiburg. Wissenschaftl. BerichtW 14/87, 1987
6 Метод испытания — Миннесота
[21] MTS Systems Corporation. Box 24012 Minneapolis. MN 55424 USA: MTS presents an artificial,
dynamic, ora! environment for evaluating dental material
29