ГОСТ Р ИСО 8253-1—2012
Библиография
[1] ISO 389-4. Acoustics — Reference zero forthe calibration of audiometric equipment — Part4: Reference levels for
narrow-band masking noise
[2] ISO 389-7. Acoustics — Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment — Part 7: Reference
threshold of heanng under free-field and diffuse-field listening conditions
[3] ISO 4869-1, Acoustics — Hearing protectors — Part 1: Subjective methods for the measurement of sound
attenuation
[4] IEC 60318-1, Electroacoustics — Simulators of human head and ear — Part 1: Earsimulatorforthe measurement
ofsupra-aural and circumaurat earphones
[5] IEC 60318-3, Electroacoustics — Simulators of human head and ear — Part3: Acoustic couplerforthe calibration
ofsupra-aural earphones used in audiometry
[6] IEC 60318-4, Electroacoustics — Simulators of human head and ear — Part 4: Occluded-ear simulator for the
measurementofearphones coupled to the ear by means of ear inserts
(7J IEC 60318-5, Electroacoustics — Simulatorsofhuman head and ear — Part 5:2 cm3couplerfor the measurement
ofhearing aids and earphones coupled to the ear by means of ear inserts
(8JIEC 60318-6, Electroacoustics — Simulators of human head and ear— Part 6. Mechanical coupler for the
measurementofbone vibrators
[9JARLINGER. S.D. Comparison of ascending and bracketing methods In pure-tone audiometry: A multi-laboratory
study. Scand. Audio/. 1979. 8. pp. 247—251
[10] BRINKMANN. K.. RICHTER. U. Kopfhorer DT 48. Schalldammung und Ohrverschluss-Effekt (Headphone DT 48:
Sound absorption and occlusion effect]. Acusf/ca 1980.47, pp. 53—54
[11] COPELAND. A.B.. MOWRY. H.J., III. Real-ear attenuation characteristics of selected noise-excluding audiometric
receiver enclosures. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1971.49. pp. 1757— 1761
[12]HOOD. J.D. Pnnciplesand practice of bone-conduction audiometry. Laryngoscope 1960.70. pp. 1211— 1228
[13] ROBINSON. D.W.. WHITTLE. L.S. A comparison of self-recording and manualaudlometry: Some systematic effects
shown by unpractised subjects. J. Sound Vibration 1973.26. pp. 41—62
[14] SANDERS. J.W. Masking. In: KATZ. J.. editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. 2nd edition, pp. 124— 140. Baltimore.
MD: Williams and Wilkins. 1978
[15] STUDEBAKER. G.A. Clinical masking. In: RINTELMANN. W.F.. editor. Hearing assessment, pp. 51— 100.
Baltimore. MD: University Park Press. 1979
[16] TYLER. R.S.. WOOD. E.J. A comparison of manual methods for measuring hearing levels. Aud/ology. 1980. 19.
pp. 316—329
[17] BERGER. E.H., KILLION, M.C. Comparison ofthe noise attenuation of three audiometricearphones, with additional
data on masking near threshold. J.Acoust. Soc Am. 1989.86. pp. 1392— 1403
[18] GOSSING. P., RICHTER. U. Characteristic data of the circumaurat earphone Sennheiser HDA 200 In the
conventional and the extended high frequencyrange. In: RICH TER. U., editor. Characteristicdata of different kindsof
earphones used in the extended high frequency range for pure-tone audiometry. PTB report PTB-MA-72.
Braunschweig. 2003
[19] LAUKLI. E.. MAIR. I.W.S. High-frequency audiometry. Normative studies and preliminary experiences. Scand.
Audio/. 1985.14, pp. 151 — 158
[20] LAUKLI. E.. FJERMEDAL. O. Reproducibility of heanng threshold measurements: Supplementary data on
bone-conduction and speech audiometry. Scand. Audio/. 1990,19. pp. 187— 190
25