ГОСТ 33042—2014
Библиография
[1] Jaenicke. J. (1982). Eisenia foetida is two biological species. Megadrilogica 4, 6-8.
[2] Oien. N. and J. Stenerson (1984). Esterases of earthworm - III. Electrophoresis reveals that Eisenia
foetida (Savigny) is two species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78c (2). 277 - 282.
[3] Kula. C. (1996). Development of a test method on sublethal effects of pesticides on the earthworm
species Eisenia fetida/ Eisenia andrei - comparison of two ringtests. In: Riepert. F.. Kula. C. (1996):
Development of laboratory methods for testing effects of chemicals and pesticides on collembola and
earthworms. Mitt. Biol. Bundesamst. f. Land- Forstwirtsch. Berlin-Dahlem. 320. p. 50-82.
[4] OECD Guideline for testing chemicals 207. Earthworm acute toxicity test. Adopted: 4 April 1984.
[5] ISO (International Organization for Standardization ) (1996). Soil Quality - Effects of pollutants on
earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Part 2: Determination of effects on reproduction. No.11268-2. ISO.
Geneve.
[6] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1993). Soil Quality - Effects of pollutants on
earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Part 1: Determination of acute toxicity using artificial soil substrate.
No.11268-1. ISO. Geneve.
[7] SETAC (1998). Advances in Earthworm Ecotoxicology. Sheppard, S.C., Bembridge. J.D.,
Holmstrup, M.. and L. Posthuma. (eds). SETAC Press. 456 pp.
[8] EPA (1996). Ecological effects test guidelines. Earthworm Subchronic Toxicity Test (850.62.00).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Prevention. Pesticides and Toxic
Substances. EPA712-C-96-167, April 1996.
[9] Bouche. M B. (1972). Lombriciens de France. EcoJogie et syst6matique. Publication de Nnstitut
National de la Recherche Agronomique.
[10] Edwards. C.A. (1983). Development of a standardized laboratory method for assessing the toxicity
of chemical substances to earthworms. Report EUR 8714 EN. Commission of European Communities.
[11] Greig-Smith, P.W.. H. Becker. P.J. Edwards and F. Heimbach (eds.) (1992). Ecotoxicology of
Earthworms. Intercept.
[12] Edwards. C.A. and J. P. Bohlen. (1996). Biology and ecology of Earthworms, 3rd Edition.
Chapman and Hall. London.
[13] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1994). Soil Quality - Determination of pH. No.
10390. ISO. Geneve.
[14] Hund-Rinke. K, Rombke. J.. Riepert. F. & Achazi R. (2000): Beurteilung der Lebensraumfunktion
von Boden mit Hilfe von Regenwurmtests. In: Toxikologische Beurteilung von Boden. Heiden, S., Erb, R..
Dott. W. & Eisentraeger, A. (eds.). Spektrum Verl.. Heidelberg. 59-81.
[15] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1992). Soil Quality -Determination of water
retention characteristics -Laboratory methods. No. 11274. ISO. Geneve.
[16] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1993). Soil Quality -Determination of dry
matter and water content on a mass basis - Gravimetric method. No. 11465. ISO. Geneve.
[17] Rombke, J. and Th. Moser (1999). Organisation and Performance of an International Ringtest for
the validation of the Enchytraeid Reproduction Test. UBA-Texte 4/99. 150+ 223 pp.
[18] Finney. D.J. (1971). Probit Analysis (3rd ed.), pp. 19-76. Cambridge Univ. Press.
[19] Finney, D.J. (1978). Statistical Method in Biological Assay. - Charles Griffin & Company Ltd,
London.
[20] Hamilton. M.A., R.C. Russo and R.V. Thurston. (1977). Trimmed Spearman-Karber Method for
estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11(7), 714-719;
Correction Environ. Sci. Tochnol. 12(1998). 417.
[21] Williams. D.A.. (1971). A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels
are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics 27,103-117.
[22] Williams. D.A.. (1972). The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics
28,519-531.
[23] Dunnett. C.W., (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a
control. Amer. Statist. Ass. J. 50.1096-1121.
[24] Dunnett, C.W., (1964) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20. 482-491.
[25] Hoeven. N. van der (1998). Power analysis for the NOEC: What is the probability of detecting
small toxic effects on three different species using the appropriate standardized test
protocols?Ecotoxicology 7: 355-361
[26] Holm, S„ (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6. 65-
70.
[27] Jonckheere, A. R. (1954). A Distribution-free k-Sample Test Against Ordered Alternatives.
Biometrika 41,133-145.
14