ГОСТ Р МЭК 61391-1—2011
Библиография
[1] IEC 61390:1996,
Ultrasonics
—
Real time poise echo systems
— 7esf
procedures to determine performance
specifications
[2] IEC 61828:2001,
Ultrasonics
—
Focusing transducers
—
Definitions and measurement methods for the transmitted
fields
[3]IEC 60584:1986.
Methods of measuring theperformance ofultrasonic pulse echo diagnostic equipment
[4]IEC 61157:1992.
Requirements forthe declaration ofthe acoustic outputofmedical diagnostic ultrasound equipment
[5]IEC 60050-801.
InternationalElectrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV)
—
Chapter 801: Acoustics and Electroacoustics
IEC 60050-802.
International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV)
—
Chapter 802: Ultrasonics
[6] Madsen E.L.. Zagzebski J.A.. Banjavic R.A. and Jutila R.E. Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms.
Med. Phys..
1978. 5: p. 391— 394
[7] USDHHS.
Quality Assurance in Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Ed. A Goldstein. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, 1980
[8]Goldstein A. and Langrill L.N. Ethylene glycol-water mixtures for use in ultrasound test objects.
J. Clin. Ultrasound.
1979. 7: p. 4 6 5 -4 7 0
[9]AIUM,
Methods for specifying acoustic properties of tissue mimicking phantoms and objects: stage 1.
Laurel. Mary
land: American Institute o f Ultrasound in Medicine. 1995
[10J AIUM.
Methods for measuring performance ofpulse-echo ultrasound imaging equipment, part II: digital methods,
stage 1.
1995, Laurel. Maryland: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
[11J Fenster A and Downey D.B. 3-D Ultrasound imaging: A review.
IEEE Trans. Engineering in Medicine and Biology.
1996. 15: p. 41— 51
[12] Nelson T.R. and Pretorius D.H. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.
1998.
24: p. 1248— 1270
[13] Muratore D.M. and Galloway R.L. Beam calibration without a phantom for creating a 3-D freehand ultrasound sys
tem.
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.
2001.27: p. 1557— 1566
[14] Chen J-F. Fowlkes J.B.. Carson P.L. and Rubin J.M. Determination of Scan-Plane Motion Using Speckle Decorrela
tion: Theoretical Considerations and Initial Test.
Internal. J. Imaging Systems and Technology.
1997. 8: p. 38— 44
[15] Tuthill ТА .. Krucker J.F., Fowlkes J.B. and Carson P.L. Automated three-dimensional US frame positioning computed
from elevational speckle decorrelation.
Radiology.
1998, 209 (2): p. 575— 582
[16] AIUM.
Standard methods for calibration of 2D and 3D spatial measurement capabilities and measurement ofpoint
spread response function of pulse echo ultrasound imaging systems.
AIUM Technical Report, eds. P.L. Carson,
T. DuBose. R. Hileman, H. Lopez. N. McDicken. M. Stone, K. W ear and J. A Zagzebski. Laurel. Maryland: American
Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2004
[17]
Handbook of Mathematical Tables.
2nd edn. Eds.: R.C. Weast. S.M. Sealby and C. D. Hodgman. Cleveland. Ohio:
Chemical Rubber Co., 1964, p. 558— 559
[18] Dubose T. "Cranial Biometry*, in
Fetal sonography.
W.B. Saunders. 1995. Chapter 8
[19] AIP.
Pulse echo ultrasound imaging systems: Performance tests andcriteria.
AAPM report #8. Eds. P.L. Carson and
J.A. Zagzebski. New York. Ne.v York: American Institute of Physics. 1981
[20] AIUM.
Standard methods for measuring performance of ultrasound imaging equipment.
Laurel. Maryland: American
Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 1991
[21] Selfridge A. Approximate Material Properties in Isotropic Materials.
IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics,
1985. SU-32:
p. 381— 384
[22] Haigis W. and Buschmann W. Echo reference standards in ophthalm ic ultrasonography.
Ultrasound in Medicine and
Biology.
1985. 11: p. 149— 155
[23] Carson P.L.. Rapid evaluation of many pulse echo system characteristics by use of a trigged pulse burst generator
with exponential decay.
J. Clin. Ultrasound.
1976. 4: p. 259— 263
[24] Faran J. Sound scattering by solid cylinders and spheres.
J. Acoust. Soc. Amer..
1951.23 (4): p. 405— 418
[25] Preston R.C. and Bond A.D. An experimental study of the reflection from spherical and flat ended cylindrical targets
suitable for fetal Doppler performance assessment.
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.
1997, 23: p. 117— 128
[26] Psychoudakis D.. Fowlkes J.B.. Volakis J.L. and Carson P.L. Potential o f microbubbles for use as point targets in
phase aberration correction.
IEEE rans. UFFC.
2004, 51: p. 1639— 1648
[27] Sboros V. et. Al. Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles.
Ultrasound in tAedicine
and Biology.
2005. 31: p. 1063— 1072
[28] Hefner L.V. and Goldstein A. Resonance by rod-shaped reflectors in ultrasound test objects.
Radiology.
1981. 139:
p. 1 8 9 -1 9 3
[29] Dandekar S., Yinbo L.. Molloy J. and Hossack J. A phantom with reduced complexity for spatial 3-D ultrasound cali
bration.
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.
2005, 31: p. 1083— 1093
[30] Poon T.C. and Rohling R.N. Comparison of calibration methods for spatial tracking of a 3-D ultrasound probe.
Ultra
sound in Medicine and Biology.
2005, 31: p. 1095— 1108
[31] Davros W.J.. Zagzebski J.A. and Madsen E.L. Frequency-dependent angular scattering of ultrasound by tissue-
mimicking materials and excised tissue.
J. Acoust. Soc. Amer..
1986. 80: p. 229— 237
[32] Satrapa J., Schultz H-J. and Doblhoff G. Latest advances in quality control for ultrasonic pulse echo imagers. In
Euroson.
2001s. Edinburgh
[33] Goldstein A. Slice thickness measurement.
Ultrasound hied.
1988. 7: p. 487— 498
31