ГОСТР ИСО 28439—2015
Библиография
|1] ISO 15900:2009
Determination of particle size distribution — Differential electrical mobility analysis for aerosol
particles (ИСО 15900:2009. Определение распределения частицпо размерам. Анализ диффе
ренциальной электрической подвижности частиц аэрозоля)
(2] EN 689
Workplace atmospheres — Guidance for the assessment of exposure by inhalation to chemical
agents for comparison with limit values and measurement strategy (EH 689. Воздух рабочей зоны.
Руководство по оценке воздействия химических веществ при их вдыхании для сравнения с
предельными значениями и методология измерений)
(3] EN 1540
Workplace atmospheres — Tenninology (EH 1540. Воздух рабочей зоны. Терминология и
определения)
(4] CEN/TR 15230
Workplace atmospheres — Guidance for sampling of inhalable. thoracic and respirable aerosol
fractions (CEH/TO 15230. Воздух рабочей зоны. Руководство по отбору проб вдыхаемой, тора
кальной и респирабельной фракций аэрозоля)
(5] Council Directive 96’29/Euratom. 13 May 1996. Basicsafety standards fortheprotection ofthe health ofworkers and
the general public against the darters arising from ionizing radiation
(6] Wang. S.C.. Flagan. R.C. Scanning electncal nrobility spectrometer. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1990. 13. pp. 230-240
|7] Flagan. R.C. Etectncal techniques. In: Baron. P.A.. Willeke. K.. editors. Aerosolmeasurement. Principles, techniques
and applications, 2nd edition, pp. 537-568. New York. NY: Wiley. 2001
[8] Chen. D.R.. Pui. D.Y.H.. Hummes, D.. Fissan, H.. Quant. F.R., Sem. G.J. Design and evaluation of a nanometer
aerosol differential nrobility analyzer (nano-DMA). J. Aerosol Sci. 1998. 29(5). pp. 497-509
[9] Wiedensohler. A. An approximation of the bipolar charge distnbution for particles in the submicron range. J. Aerosol
Sci. 1998. 19(3). pp. 387-389
[10] Mohlmann. C. Ultrafeine Aerosole am Arbeitsplatz. Sicherheitstechnisches Informations- und Arbeitsblatt [Ultraf-me
aerosols in the workplace, technical safety information and worksheet], 120130, BGIA-Handbuch. Berlin: Erich
Schmidt. 2007
[11] Koch. W.. Pohlmann. G.. Schwarz. K. A reference number concentration generator for ultrafine aerosols based on
Brownian coagulation. J. Aerosol Sci. 2008.39(2). pp. 150-155
[12] Dahmann. D.. Riediger. G.. Schlatter. J.. Wiedensohler. A., Carli. S.. Graff, A.. Grosser. M., HojgR. M., Horn. H.G.,
Jing. L.. Matter. U.. Monz. C.. Mosimann. T.. Stein. H., Wehner. B.. Wieser. U. Intercomparison of mobility particle
sizers (MPS). Gefahrst. Reinhalt. L. 2001. 61(10). pp. 423-428
[13] Swiss Federal Office of Metrology (METAS). Combustion particles — Nanoparticles — Fine dust. Available (viewed
2010-10-15) in EN. FR. DE, ITat:
http://www.metas.ch’,metasweb/Fachbereiche/Partikel_und_Aerosole’Verbrennungspartikel
[14] Hinds, W.C. Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement ofairborne particles. 2ndedition. New York.
NY: Wiley. 1999
[15] Japuntich. DA. Franklin. L.M.. Pui, D.Y.. Kuehn, T.H., Kim. S.C.. Viner. A.S. A comparison of two nano-sized particle
air filtration tests in the diameter range of 10 to 400 nanometers. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2007. 9. pp. 93-107
[16] Langmead. W.A. Air sampling as part of an integrated programme of monitoring of the worker and his environment.
In: Walton. W.H.. editor. Inhaled Particles 3. pp. 983-994. Old Woking: Unwin Brothers. 1971
[17] Breslin, A.J.. Glauberman. H.. George, A.C.. LeClare. P.. Ong, L. The accuracy of dust exposure estimates obtained
from conventional air sampling. Am. Indust. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1967. 28(1). pp. 56-61
[18] Stevens, D.C. The particle size and mean concentration of radioactive aerosols measured by personal and static air
samples. Алл. Occup. Hyg. 1969. 12(1). pp. 33-40
[19] Fletcher. B.. Johnson. A.E. Comparison of personal and area concentration measurements and the use of a manikin
in sampling. In: VINCENT. J.H.. editor. Ventilation 88. pp. 161-165. New York. NY: Pergamon. 1989
[20] Bauer. H.-O., Baumgart. S., Berger. D.. Dahmann. D., Fricke. H.-H., Schriever, E. Dieselmotoremissionen am Ar
beitsplatz — Probleme beim Vergleich verschiedener Probenahmeverfahren [Diesel engine emissions in the work
place — Problems in the comparison of different sampling procedures], Gefahrst. Reinhalt. L 1995. 55. pp. 103-106
[21] Gibb. H.J., Lees. P.S.J., Pinsky, P.F., Rooney. B.C. Lung cancer among workers in chromium chemical production.
Am. J. Indust. f,4ed. 2000. 38(2). pp. 115-126
[22] Metha. A.J.. Wang. X.R., Eisen. E.A.. Dai. H.L.. Astrakianakis, G.. Seixas. N.. Camp. J.. Checkoway. H.. Chris-tiani.
D.C. Work area measurements as predictors of personal exposure to endotoxin and cotton dust in the cotton textile
industry. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2008. 52(1), pp. 45-54
15