ГОСТ 33061-2014; Страница 23

или поделиться

Ещё ГОСТы из 41757, используйте поиск в верху страницы

ГОСТ 32971-2014 Производство сахара. Термины и определения (Настоящий стандарт устанавливает термины и определения понятий в области производства сахара. Термины, установленные настоящим стандартом, рекомендуются для применения во всех видах документации и литературы по производству сахара, входящих в сферу работ по стандартизации и/или использующих результаты этих работ) ГОСТ 32929-2014 Мороженое кисломолочное. Технические условия (Настоящий стандарт распространяется на закаленное кисломолочное мороженое (далее - мороженое), предназначенное для непосредственного употребления в пищу) ГОСТ 32630-2014 Методы испытаний химической продукции, представляющей опасность для окружающей среды. Оценка коэффициента адсорбции почвой и осадками сточных вод методом высокоэффективной жидкостной хроматографии (Настоящий стандарт устанавливает методы испытания химических веществ с использованием высокоэффективной жидкостной хроматографии (ВЭЖХ) для оценки коэффициента их адсорбции (Koc) почвой и осадками сточных вод)

Страница 23

Страница 1

Untitled document

ГОСТ 33061-2014

Библиография

[1]Schrader G„ Metge K„ and Bahadir M. (1998). Importance of salt ions in ecotoxicological tests

with soil arthropods. Applied Soil Ecology. 7, 189-193.

[2]International Organisation of Standards. (1993). ISO 11269-1. Soil Quality - Determination of

the Effects of Pollutants on Soil Flora - Part 1: Method for the Measurement of Inhibition of Root

Growth.

[3]International Organisation of Standards. (1995). ISO 11269-2. Soil Quality - Determination of

the Effects of Pollutants on Soil Flora - Part 2: Effects of Chemicals on the Emergence and Growth of

Higher Plants.

[4] American Standard for Testing Material (ASTM). (2002). E 1963-98. Standard Guide for

Conducting Terrestrial Plant Toxidty Tests.

[5]U.S. EPA. (1982). FIFRA. 40CFR. Part 158.540. Subdivision J. Parts 122-1 and 123-1.

[6] US EPA. (1996).OPPTS Harmonized Test Guidelines. Series 850. Ecological Effects Test

Guidelines:

•850.4000: Background - Non-target Plant Testing;

850.4025: Target Area Phytotoxicity;

850.4100: Terrestrial Plant Toxicity. Tier I (Seedling Emergence);

850.4200: Seed Germination/Root Elongation Toxicity Test;

850.4225: Seedling Emergence. Tier II;

850.4230: Early Seedling Growth Toxicity Test.

[7] AFNOR. X31-201. (1982). Essai d’inhibition de la germination de semences par une substance.

AFNOR X31-203/ISO 11269-1. (1993) Determination des effets dos polluants sur la floro du sol: Mcthode de

mesurage de I’inhibition de la croissance des racines.

[8] Boutin. C., Freemark. K.E. and Keddy. C.J. (1993). Proposed guidelines for registration of

chemical pesticides: Non-target plant testing and evaluation. Technical Report Series No.145.

Canadian Wildlife Service (Headquarters), Environment Canada. Hull, Quebec. Canada.

[9]Forster, R., Heimbach. U., Kula. C., and Zwerger. P. (1997). Effects of Plant Protection Products

on Non-Target Organisms - A contribution to the Discussion of Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation

for Terrestrial Non-Target Organisms (Flora and Fauna). Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd. No

48.

[10] Hale. B.. Hall, J.C.. Solomon. K., and Stephenson. G. (1994). A Critical Review of the Proposed

Guidelines for Registration of Chemical Pesticides; Non-Target Plant Testing and Evaluation. Centre for

Toxicology. University of Guelph. Ontario Canada.

[11] Soil Texture Classification (US and FAO systems): Weed Science. 33, Suppl. 1 (1985) and Soil

Sc. Soc. Amer. Proc. 26:305 (1962).

[12] Audus. L.J. (1964). Herbicide behaviour in the soil. In: Audus, L.J. ed. The Physiology and

biochemistry of Herbicides. London. New York. Academic Press. NY. Chapter 5. pp. 163-206.

[13] Beall. M.L., Jr. and Nash. R.G. (1969). Crop seedling uptake of DDT, dieldrin, endrin. and

heptachlor from soil, J. Agro. 61:571-575.

[14] Beetsman, G.D.. Kenney, D.R. and Chesters. G. (1969). Dieldrin uptake by corn as affected by

soil properties. J. Agro. 61:247-250.

[15] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (1987). Environmental Assessment Technical

Handbook. Environmental Assessment Technical Assistance Document 4.07, Seedling Growth. 14 pp.,

FDA, Washington. DC.

[16] McKelvey. R.A.. Wright. J.P.. Honegger, J.L. and Warren. L.W. (2002). A Comparison of Crop

and Non-crop Plants as Sensitive Indicator Species for Regulatory Testing. Pest Management Science

vol. 58:1161-1174.

[17] Boutin. C., Elmegaard. N. and Kjaer, C. (2004). Toxidty testing of fifteen non-crop plant species

with six herbicides in a greenhouse experiment: Implications for risk assessment. Ecotoxicology vol. 13(4):

349-369.

[18] Boutin, C., and Rogers. C.A. (2000). Patterns of sensitivity of plant species to various herbicides

-A n analysis with two databases. Ecotoxicology vol.9(4):255-271.

[19] Boutin, C. and Harper, J.L. (1991). A comparative study of the population dynamics of five

species of Veronica in natural habitats. J. Ecol. 9:155-271.

[20] Boutin, C., Lee. H.-B.. Peart. T.E., Batchelor. S.P. and Maguire. RJ. . (2000). Effects of the

sulfonylurea herbicide metsulfuron methyl on growth and reproduction of five wetland and terrestrial plant

species. Envir. Toxicol. Chem. 19 (10): 2532-2541.

[21] OECD Series on Testing and Assessment. (2005 draft). Current Approaches in the Statistical